From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stan Hoeppner Subject: Re: What's the typical RAID10 setup? Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:03:47 -0600 Message-ID: <4D4C85D3.2030903@hardwarefreak.com> References: <4D475AB5.10600@hardwarefreak.com> <20110203110428.GA26762@www2.open-std.org> <4D4B3DAE.3070502@hardwarefreak.com> <20110204070613.GA3788@www2.open-std.org> <4D4BB87A.30800@hardwarefreak.com> <20110204090602.GA4017@www2.open-std.org> <20110204204251.GB6603@www2.open-std.org> <4D4C6C7B.2020304@hardwarefreak.com> <20110204220507.GA6876@www2.open-std.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110204220507.GA6876@www2.open-std.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Keld_J=F8rn_Simonsen?= Cc: Jon Nelson , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathias_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bur=E9n?= , Roberto Spadim , Denis , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids Keld J=F8rn Simonsen put forth on 2/4/2011 4:05 PM: > I am a little puzzled with what you mean here. RAID 1+0 is covered No, it's not. I see no mention of "RAID 1+0" anywhere in SNIA document= s. I _do_ see "RAID 10" casually mentioned in many places in their documents= =2E But I've yet to find where they define or bother to minimally explain the t= erm "RAID 10". In technical writing you must define something before you discuss= or reference it. --=20 Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html