From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Turmel Subject: Re: Linux software RAID assistance Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:34:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4D5E7556.803@turmel.org> References: <4D540F6C.6050904@gmail.com> <20110215155315.55d35b8e@notabene.brown> <4D5A92F3.1090004@turmel.org> <4D5BD678.2050200@gmail.com> <4D5BE119.7000804@turmel.org> <4D5C0E17.3060306@gmail.com> <4D5C140F.9010301@turmel.org> <4D5C1508.3040308@gmail.com> <4D5C15D3.1070608@turmel.org> <4D5C167C.7000101@turmel.org> <4D5C1CF8.1020507@gmail.com> <4D5C1E0B.9060300@turmel.org> <4D5C2061.4060106@gmail.com> <4D5C2143.3000907@turmel.org> <4D5C2260.3020800@gmail.com> <4D5C273E.7020609@turmel.org> <4D5E7123.5020103@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Mcnair Cc: NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 02/18/2011 08:29 AM, Simon Mcnair wrote: > top - 13:28:45 up 1 day, 39 min, 12 users, load average: 2.65, 2.49, 2.37 > Tasks: 340 total, 7 running, 333 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu0 : 47.9%us, 15.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 13.7%id, 21.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 2.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu1 : 54.8%us, 8.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 33.3%id, 3.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu2 : 46.5%us, 13.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 37.9%id, 1.9%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu3 : 49.5%us, 9.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 37.6%id, 3.4%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu4 : 48.7%us, 8.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 17.3%id, 25.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st > Cpu5 : 50.3%us, 7.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 41.8%id, 0.6%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu6 : 53.5%us, 6.6%sy, 0.0%ni, 38.4%id, 1.6%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu7 : 52.0%us, 6.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 41.2%id, 0.6%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Mem: 12299244k total, 12227064k used, 72180k free, 10754600k buffers > Swap: 11534332k total, 0k used, 11534332k free, 175916k cached Hmmm. Not what I expected at all. I'd be very interested in some performance tests of the Supermicro ports vs. motherboard ports on that system. Phil