Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

[Lasse Jensen]

I just keep having bad luck with my RAID 5 array. One drive (out of 4
WD15EARS drives) was dropped from the array due to powerfailure and
rebuild failed because of bad sectors on another drive. I have been
spending the last few days with ddrescue, copying the data from the
drive with bad sectors to the dropped one. The problem is now that the
drive has bad sectors have spread where the md superblock used to be
on the faulty drive (the very last sectors of the drive, right?), so
how do i force it to assemble without it and with one drive missing?

What drives are by the way the best consumer grade drives to use for
RAID operation?

I really, really hope this is the last time i need to ask you guys for help.

-- 
Lasse Jensen (fafler at gmail dot com)

Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

[Jaap Crezee]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 401 bytes --]

On 02/23/11 15:05, Lasse Jensen wrote:
> I really, really hope this is the last time i need to ask you guys for help.

Well, just a little bit off-topic, but...:
For me, and probably others as well, it does not harm in any way to keep asking 
questions. I find it interesting and insightful reading some of the answers to 
these questions.
So please do ask.

Regards,

Jaap Crezee





[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3756 bytes --]

Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

[Lasse Jensen]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:45 AM,  <hansbkk@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Lasse Jensen <fafler@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What drives are by the way the best consumer grade drives to use for
>> RAID operation?
>
> I've had good luck with Hitachi (used to be IBM) and Samsung lately,
> more so than WD. Hitachi's 5-year warranty (everyone else here being
> only 3) is also an indicator. . .

I used IBM back when they made the infamous DeathStar drives. Havent
brought a IBM/Hitachi drive since. I guess i'm going to feel the same
way about WD drives now. Maybe i should just mix'n'match manufactures.
They can't all be that bad,

> I know Google uses consumer-grade drives (with massive redundancy and
> automated hyper-vigilant sysadmin processes) - anyone know whose?
>
>
>> I just keep having bad luck with my RAID 5 array. One drive (out of 4
>> WD15EARS drives) was dropped from the array due to powerfailure and
>> rebuild failed because of bad sectors on another drive. I have been
>
> Sorry I can't help more but with any such large drives I'd suggest
> sticking with RAID6, plus hot spares if you think you might not notice
> and/or be able to quickly replace a failing member.

That was my plan, but without the hotspare. I have 2 drives i need to
get replaced, and after i hopefully regain access to my data, i'm
going for a 5 drive RAID 6 array.

-- 
Lasse Jensen (fafler at gmail dot com)

Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

[Iordan Iordanov]

Hey,

> I used IBM back when they made the infamous DeathStar drives. Havent
> brought a IBM/Hitachi drive since. I guess i'm going to feel the same
> way about WD drives now. Maybe i should just mix'n'match manufactures.
> They can't all be that bad,

Mixing and matching drive manufacturers seems like an excellent idea, 
since it makes it less likely that drives will die in droves at the same 
time, which makes for a generally saver RAID. On this mailing list we 
know that drives fail and expect it, that's why we are on it :)

Cheers,
Iordan

Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

[John Robinson]

On 24/02/2011 16:10, Iordan Iordanov wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> I used IBM back when they made the infamous DeathStar drives. Havent
>> brought a IBM/Hitachi drive since. I guess i'm going to feel the same
>> way about WD drives now. Maybe i should just mix'n'match manufactures.
>> They can't all be that bad,
>
> Mixing and matching drive manufacturers seems like an excellent idea,
> since it makes it less likely that drives will die in droves at the same
> time, which makes for a generally saver RAID. On this mailing list we
> know that drives fail and expect it, that's why we are on it :)

Indeed. I started my home server off with a 3-drive RAID-5, with 3 
identical drives with consecutive serial numbers. One started giving 
building pending sectors within a month, another after 9 months. By now 
I have 6 drives in RAID-6 from 3 manufacturers with varying 
power-on-hours and no two from the same batch.

Cheers,

John.

Re: Assembling RAID 5 array with missing superblock

[Lasse Jensen]

So should I just bite it and build a new array? All the really
important stuff is backed up elsewhere, the rest is, well, just crap i
got of the Internet, you know...

One last thing, I've been thinking about. What copying the superblock
from one of the working drives to the defect one and using a hew
editor to change the drive number and alignment? Is there much device
specific data in the superblock?

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Lasse Jensen <fafler@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just keep having bad luck with my RAID 5 array. One drive (out of 4
> WD15EARS drives) was dropped from the array due to powerfailure and
> rebuild failed because of bad sectors on another drive. I have been
> spending the last few days with ddrescue, copying the data from the
> drive with bad sectors to the dropped one. The problem is now that the
> drive has bad sectors have spread where the md superblock used to be
> on the faulty drive (the very last sectors of the drive, right?), so
> how do i force it to assemble without it and with one drive missing?
>
> What drives are by the way the best consumer grade drives to use for
> RAID operation?
>
> I really, really hope this is the last time i need to ask you guys for help.
>
> --
> Lasse Jensen (fafler at gmail dot com)
>



-- 
Lasse Jensen (fafler at gmail dot com)