linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Cc: CoolCold <coolthecold@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network-based RAID6
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:35:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D933188.30003@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110330144944.3c87185c@natsu>

Roman Mamedov put forth on 3/30/2011 3:49 AM:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:20:41 +0400
> CoolCold <coolthecold@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Looking on your host I think you speak russian, so may be this will be
>> somehow helpful for you
>> http://community.livejournal.com/ru_root/2216389.html
> 
> Thanks -- I have looked through the websites of some distributed filesystems
> (Ceph, GlusterFS, MooseFS etc) and checked this thread too, but from what I
> could find, all filesystems I read about so far are at most capable of RAID0 or
> RAID1-like modes, where fault-tolerance is either not provided, or achieved
> only by "all data is replicated across N nodes", which of course divides the
> total usable space by N. I haven't found any FS which would do block-level
> replication relying not on dumb copies, but on RAID5/6-like parity algorithms
> for fault-tolerance. Maybe I missed something?

You likely won't find any distributed filesystem that performs block
level replication over the network, at least not a FOSS one.  These are
filesystems, mind you, not distributed block device drivers.  If they
perform any replication to afford a level of fault tolerance, it will be
at the file level, not the block level.

If you want true block level replication over a network, look into DRBD.
 However, it is also limited to mirroring.

-- 
Stan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30  7:11 Network-based RAID6 Roman Mamedov
2011-03-30  7:20 ` CoolCold
2011-03-30  8:49   ` Roman Mamedov
2011-03-30 13:35     ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2011-03-30 14:24       ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-30 14:43         ` Miles Fidelman
2011-03-30 14:58           ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-30 17:50       ` Roman Mamedov
2011-03-30 18:17         ` Roberto Spadim
2011-03-31  4:56         ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-03-31  5:16           ` Roman Mamedov
2011-03-31  5:35             ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-03-31  7:59             ` hansbkk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D933188.30003@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=coolthecold@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).