From: Yann Ormanns <yann-ormanns@web.de>
To: lists@xunil.at
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Do I understand my RAID6 correctly?
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:17:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA4891B.6050505@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA42C92.8010704@xunil.at>
Subject: Re: Do I understand my RAID6 correctly?
From: Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@xunil.at>
To: Yann Ormanns <yann-ormanns@web.de>
Date: 2011-04-12 19:03 (+0200)
>
> I already exported the controller-logs and will look through for SMART
> info. Unfortunately the controller does not allow the use of
> smartmontools, I can only use the specific ICP Storage Manager.
>
I recommend to compare the active hours and the serial numbers of the
disks. So you can _perhaps_ predict the next disk with problems.
Unfortunately, SMART-data is no credible basis for any hard disk failure
predictions.
For further information, you may want to take a look at this german
link:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Google-Studie-zur-Ausfallursache-von-Festplatten-147178.html
and / or at this document http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf
>
> Scary. Yes, the server uses the same model for all 9 devices.
Yeah, that's really scary - it shows, that even with a RAID6 your data
is not absolutely safe. But I have to admit that this is "only" the
worst case scenario - the chance that this situation occurs, is really
small (but not impossible).
I suppose, that your customer keeps his backups up to date although he
uses a RAID6?
> From your domain I see that you seem to be located in germany, so you
> might know the manufacturer of the server: transtec.
>
No, I do not know this manucaturer - but I'm just a private user, so I
don't really have any experiences with "real" servers :)
Best regards,
Yann
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 8:39 Do I understand my RAID6 correctly? Stefan G. Weichinger
2011-04-12 9:23 ` Yann Ormanns
2011-04-12 10:42 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2011-04-12 17:17 ` Yann Ormanns [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA4891B.6050505@web.de \
--to=yann-ormanns@web.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@xunil.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).