linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:24:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA48AC5.30007@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412165455.GB23764@infradead.org>

On 2011-04-12 18:54, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:49:53PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> I realize that, in fact it's already safe as long as you pass in 'true'
>> for __blk_run_queue(). Before I had rewritten it to move the running
>> out, so that makes the trick a little difficult. This afternoon I also
>> tested it and saw no noticable difference, but I'll probably just do it
>> anyway as it makes sense.
> 
> We still need the lock for __elv_add_request, so we'll need to keep the
> logic anyway.  But splitting out the just queue to kblockd case from
> __blk_run_queue and giving the latter a sane prototype still sounds
> like a good idea to me.
> 
> Btw, now that we don't call the request_fn directly any more and thus
> can't block, can the unplugging be moved into the preempt notifiers?

It was only partly the reason, there's still the notice on preempt
(instead of schedule) and the runqueue lock problem. And if we allow
preempt, then we need to do disable preempt around all the plug logic.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1295659049-2688-1-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
     [not found] ` <1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTin8FoXX6oqUyW+scwhadyX-TfW16_oKjvngU9-m@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20110303221353.GA10366@redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <4D761E0D.8050200@fusionio.com>
     [not found]         ` <20110308202100.GA31744@redhat.com>
     [not found]           ` <4D76912C.9040705@fusionio.com>
     [not found]             ` <20110308220526.GA393@redhat.com>
     [not found]               ` <20110310005810.GA17911@redhat.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20110405130541.6c2b5f86@notabene.brown>
2011-04-11  4:50                   ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging NeilBrown
2011-04-11  9:19                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 10:59                       ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:04                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:26                           ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:37                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:05                               ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:11                                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:36                                   ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:48                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12  1:12                                       ` hch
2011-04-12  8:36                                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:22                                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:28                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:41                                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:58                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:31                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:45                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 14:34                                                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 21:08                                                         ` NeilBrown
2011-04-13  2:23                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 11:12                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:23                                                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 11:41                                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 15:13                                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 17:35                                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:58                                                     ` hch
2011-04-12 17:29                                                       ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:44                                                   ` hch
2011-04-12 16:49                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:54                                                       ` hch
2011-04-12 17:24                                                         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-04-12 13:40                                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:48                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 23:35                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 16:50                                           ` hch
2011-04-15  4:26                                   ` hch
2011-04-15  6:34                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-17 22:19                                   ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  4:19                                     ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  6:38                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18  7:25                                       ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  8:10                                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18  8:33                                           ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  8:42                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 21:23                                             ` hch
2011-04-18 21:30                                             ` hch
2011-04-18 22:38                                               ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 10:55                                                 ` hch
2011-04-18  9:19                                           ` hch
2011-04-18  9:40                                             ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-04-18  9:47                                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18  9:46                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:55                         ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:12                           ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 22:58                             ` hch
2011-04-12  6:20                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 16:59                     ` hch
2011-04-11 21:14                       ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 22:59                         ` hch
2011-04-12  6:18                         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DA48AC5.30007@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).