From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:40:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAC070C.6010403@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110418091959.GA32013@infradead.org>
On 04/18/2011 11:19 AM, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> Btw, I really start to wonder if the request level is the right place
> to do this on-stack plugging. Wouldn't it be better to just plug
> bios in the on-stack queue? That way we could also stop doing the
> special case merging when adding to the plug list, and leave all the
> merging / I/O schedule logic in the __make_request path. Probably
> not .39 material, but worth a prototype?
>
> Also what this dicussion brought up is that the block layer data
> structures are highly confusing. Using a small subset of the
> request_queue also for make_request based driver just doesn't make
> sense. It seems like we should try to migrate the required state
> to struct gendisk, and submit I/O through a block_device_ops.submit
> method, leaving the request_queue as an internal abstraction for
> the request based drivers.
>
Good point.
It would also help us we the device-mapper redesign agk and myself
discussed at LSF. Having a block_device_ops.submit function would
allow us remap the actual request queue generically; and we would
even be able to address more than one request queue, which sounds
awfully similar to what Jens is trying to do ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1295659049-2688-1-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <AANLkTin8FoXX6oqUyW+scwhadyX-TfW16_oKjvngU9-m@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110303221353.GA10366@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D761E0D.8050200@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308202100.GA31744@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4D76912C.9040705@fusionio.com>
[not found] ` <20110308220526.GA393@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110310005810.GA17911@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20110405130541.6c2b5f86@notabene.brown>
2011-04-11 4:50 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging NeilBrown
2011-04-11 9:19 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 10:59 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:26 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:05 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:36 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 1:12 ` hch
2011-04-12 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:22 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:45 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 14:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-13 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 15:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 17:35 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:29 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:44 ` hch
2011-04-12 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:54 ` hch
2011-04-12 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 16:50 ` hch
2011-04-15 4:26 ` hch
2011-04-15 6:34 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-17 22:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 4:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 6:38 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 7:25 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 8:33 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 21:23 ` hch
2011-04-18 21:30 ` hch
2011-04-18 22:38 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 10:55 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:19 ` hch
2011-04-18 9:40 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2011-04-18 9:47 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 9:46 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:55 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 22:58 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 16:59 ` hch
2011-04-11 21:14 ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 22:59 ` hch
2011-04-12 6:18 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DAC070C.6010403@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).