linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:47:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAC08BB.6060202@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DAC070C.6010403@suse.de>

On 2011-04-18 11:40, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 04/18/2011 11:19 AM, hch@infradead.org wrote:
>> Btw, I really start to wonder if the request level is the right place
>> to do this on-stack plugging.  Wouldn't it be better to just plug
>> bios in the on-stack queue?  That way we could also stop doing the
>> special case merging when adding to the plug list, and leave all the
>> merging / I/O schedule logic in the __make_request path.  Probably
>> not .39 material, but worth a prototype?
>>
>> Also what this dicussion brought up is that the block layer data
>> structures are highly confusing.  Using a small subset of the
>> request_queue also for make_request based driver just doesn't make
>> sense.  It seems like we should try to migrate the required state
>> to struct gendisk, and submit I/O through a block_device_ops.submit
>> method, leaving the request_queue as an internal abstraction for
>> the request based drivers.
>>
> Good point.
> It would also help us we the device-mapper redesign agk and myself 
> discussed at LSF. Having a block_device_ops.submit function would
> allow us remap the actual request queue generically; and we would 
> even be able to address more than one request queue, which sounds 
> awfully similar to what Jens is trying to do ...

The multiqueue bits would still have one request_queue, but multiple
queueing structures (I called those blk_queue_ctx, iirc).

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1295659049-2688-1-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
     [not found] ` <1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com>
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTin8FoXX6oqUyW+scwhadyX-TfW16_oKjvngU9-m@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20110303221353.GA10366@redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <4D761E0D.8050200@fusionio.com>
     [not found]         ` <20110308202100.GA31744@redhat.com>
     [not found]           ` <4D76912C.9040705@fusionio.com>
     [not found]             ` <20110308220526.GA393@redhat.com>
     [not found]               ` <20110310005810.GA17911@redhat.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20110405130541.6c2b5f86@notabene.brown>
2011-04-11  4:50                   ` [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging NeilBrown
2011-04-11  9:19                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 10:59                       ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:04                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:26                           ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 11:37                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:05                               ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:11                                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 12:36                                   ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:48                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12  1:12                                       ` hch
2011-04-12  8:36                                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:22                                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:28                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 12:41                                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 12:58                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:31                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:45                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 14:34                                                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 21:08                                                         ` NeilBrown
2011-04-13  2:23                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 11:12                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 11:23                                                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-13 11:41                                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-13 15:13                                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-13 17:35                                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:58                                                     ` hch
2011-04-12 17:29                                                       ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:44                                                   ` hch
2011-04-12 16:49                                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 16:54                                                       ` hch
2011-04-12 17:24                                                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:40                                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 13:48                                                 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 23:35                                                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-12 16:50                                           ` hch
2011-04-15  4:26                                   ` hch
2011-04-15  6:34                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-17 22:19                                   ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  4:19                                     ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  6:38                                     ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18  7:25                                       ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  8:10                                         ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18  8:33                                           ` NeilBrown
2011-04-18  8:42                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-18 21:23                                             ` hch
2011-04-18 21:30                                             ` hch
2011-04-18 22:38                                               ` NeilBrown
2011-04-20 10:55                                                 ` hch
2011-04-18  9:19                                           ` hch
2011-04-18  9:40                                             ` [dm-devel] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-04-18  9:47                                               ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-04-18  9:46                                             ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 11:55                         ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 12:12                           ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 22:58                             ` hch
2011-04-12  6:20                               ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-11 16:59                     ` hch
2011-04-11 21:14                       ` NeilBrown
2011-04-11 22:59                         ` hch
2011-04-12  6:18                         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DAC08BB.6060202@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).