From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Iordan Iordanov <iordan@cdf.toronto.edu>
Subject: Re: debian software raid1
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:07:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4DB21836.7060607@cdf.toronto.edu>
References: <1303215166.2809.8.camel@valio> <BANLkTik7iVaUH2bn9spW2gtV-TkjLH2Qag@mail.gmail.com> <4DADB24F.2030300@cdf.toronto.edu> <20110420085148.12ac0002@notabene.brown> <4DAE29EA.4040306@gmail.com> <4DAEF2F1.8080204@cdf.toronto.edu> <20110421061545.GA15220@maude.comedia.it> <4DB04434.4080505@cdf.toronto.edu> <20110422055939.GA14247@maude.comedia.it> <4DB1D4DD.7070901@cdf.toronto.edu> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104222126230.13186@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104222126230.13186@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Hi Mikael,

On 04/22/11 15:28, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> The document never claims to be about 80GB drives.

But the document was proffered as proof that drives from different 
manufacturers have the same capacity, whereas I find this to not be the 
case for smaller drives. I never claimed the document is for 80GB drives.

Cheers,
Iordan