From: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: neilb@suse.de, Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: md question re: max_hw_sectors_kb
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:20:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC0639E.1070707@sgi.com> (raw)
Resending to linux-raid.
Hi Neil,
My name is Mike Reed. I work at SGI. I've been looking at a performance
issue with md writes and have tracked it down to the md device not having
a high enough initial max_hw_sectors_kb setting.
There is code in blk_queue_make_request() which lowers the default value
from INT_MAX to BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS, which is 255. This is generally
lower than all the underlying devices with which I use md.
As md appears to be a stacking driver, i.e., it calls disk_stack_limits()
for each member of a volume, it would seem reasonable for md to use the,
INT_MAX setting for max_hw_sectors_kb instead of BLK_SAFE_MAX_SECTORS.
I have tried this, and have observed that md correctly limits the md device's
max_sectors_kb to the value of the underlying devices in my mirror volume.
Is this the correct way to address this issue?
Applies to linux-2.6.39-rc4.
Signed-off-by: Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>
--- drivers/md/md.c 2011-04-18 21:26:00.000000000 -0700
+++ drivers/md/md.c.new 2011-04-21 15:53:11.452536201 -0700
@@ -4328,6 +4328,7 @@ static int md_alloc(dev_t dev, char *nam
mddev->queue->queuedata = mddev;
blk_queue_make_request(mddev->queue, md_make_request);
+ blk_queue_max_sectors(mddev->queue, INT_MAX);
disk = alloc_disk(1 << shift);
if (!disk) {
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 20:20 Michael Reed [this message]
2011-05-04 17:58 ` md question re: max_hw_sectors_kb Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-04 18:08 ` Bernd Schubert
2011-05-09 23:52 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-12 3:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-31 3:06 ` fibreraid
2011-05-06 4:24 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-06 4:40 ` NeilBrown
2011-05-09 16:02 ` Michael Reed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC0639E.1070707@sgi.com \
--to=mdr@sgi.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).