From: Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HBA Adaptor advice
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:33:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDA37F5.1000003@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDA2FD9.3020303@hardwarefreak.com>
On 23/05/2011 10:58, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Multiple drives definitely went offline, but I doubt
> it's due to a real RAID ASIC with custom firmware and a TLER issue.
> More likely, given the price, it was a backplane signal quality problem,
> for which cheap backplanes are notorious.
I think we shouldn't bang this one to death any further, but your
statement above could be interpreted that whilst the drives may not be
ideal, likely they weren't the issue in this case?
If the cheap WD drives weren't the main issue then perhaps at least this
example shouldn't be used as an example of why NOT to use those drives?
> Either way, cheap
> not-fit-for-RAID drives were stuffed into a cheap RAID box and disaster
> was the result.
But likely due to what boils down to "cables falling out" is what you
seem to be guessing?
> WDC
> itself says not to use the Green drives in RAID arrays.
The problem with taking the manufacturers word on this is that they
provide two products and claim one is "good enough" and that the other
"lasts way longer", and then price them quite significantly differently
Now, without even looking inside the two identical metal chassis, you
have to admit: a) there is incentive for them to tell fibs here in order
to gain a price premium and b) given the "reliable" drives are roughly
twice the cost then there should be sufficient extra engineering in
there that we can look for third party documentation, patents and other
supplemental information to learn more about what that engineering is
and gain confidence that the money is well spent?
I guess you have two near equal priced options:
a) 12 disk RAID6 using "enterprise" drives
b) 12x 2 disk RAID 1, plus 12x RAID6 on the top of that (some variant of
RAID61 basically)
Does having twice the number of "cheap" drives make the thing more or
less reliable? (More drives = higher probability of individual drive
failing, but additional redundancy decreases chance of total loss). I
need to crank some numbers in excel to try and get my head around which
is better for a given failure probability
Cheers
Ed W
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-23 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-19 12:26 HBA Adaptor advice Ed W
2011-05-19 12:36 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-19 12:43 ` Mathias Burén
2011-05-19 14:06 ` Michael Sallaway
2011-05-19 19:10 ` Thomas Harold
2011-05-19 21:12 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2011-05-19 21:07 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-20 20:58 ` Tobias McNulty
2011-05-20 21:23 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-20 2:08 ` Andy Smith
2011-05-20 5:30 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-21 9:52 ` Ed W
2011-05-20 7:33 ` Ed W
2011-05-20 10:21 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-21 11:17 ` Ed W
2011-05-21 11:29 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2011-05-21 11:54 ` Ed W
2011-05-21 17:37 ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-22 9:41 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-22 10:03 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2011-05-23 9:32 ` Ed W
2011-05-21 17:05 ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-22 9:04 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-22 10:09 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-22 19:25 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-22 20:57 ` Tobias McNulty
2011-05-22 21:13 ` Johannes Truschnigg
2011-05-23 9:48 ` Ed W
2011-05-23 10:44 ` John Robinson
2011-05-22 23:19 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-23 4:09 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-23 5:54 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-23 6:08 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-23 10:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-23 11:35 ` David Brown
2011-05-23 6:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-23 7:23 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-22 23:44 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-23 0:07 ` Brad Campbell
2011-05-23 5:30 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2011-05-23 10:18 ` Ed W
2011-05-23 9:58 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-23 10:33 ` Ed W [this message]
2011-05-23 11:21 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-20 12:18 ` Joe Landman
2011-05-20 12:34 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-20 12:36 ` Mathias Burén
2011-05-20 12:48 ` Joe Landman
2011-05-20 13:21 ` Ed W
2011-05-20 14:23 ` Joe Landman
2011-05-20 20:01 ` Andy Smith
2011-05-20 20:12 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-05-20 20:24 ` Drew
2011-05-20 20:58 ` Stan Hoeppner
[not found] ` <4DD7A100.2010807@wildgooses.com>
2011-05-22 8:13 ` Stan Hoeppner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-23 2:11 Jim Schatzman
2011-05-23 3:39 ` Tobias McNulty
2011-05-23 10:42 ` Ed W
2011-05-23 11:14 HBA Adaptor Advice Ed W
2011-05-23 11:55 ` Joe Landman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDA37F5.1000003@wildgooses.com \
--to=lists@wildgooses.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists2009@fnarfbargle.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).