From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: standard performance (write speed 20Mb/s)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:04:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E23F736.30601@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110717132833.GC2614@teal.hq.k1024.org>
On 17/07/2011 14:28, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 01:51:11PM +0100, John Robinson wrote:
[...]
>> doesn't work in magic sizes, so we should be using a more realistic
>> benchmarking tool like bonnie++.
>
> Honestly, I don't find bonnie++ a realistic tool. fio is a much better
> one; bonnie is quite old and inflexible.
Ah OK, yes I agree with you there, but my general point remains: dd
might be OK for producing one very specific metric in some cases, but
that will not give a realistic impression of real use performance, so we
should be using a more realistic benchmarking tool.
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-18 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-16 19:40 standard performance (write speed 20Mb/s) Pol Hallen
2011-07-17 4:26 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-17 8:12 ` Pol Hallen
2011-07-17 12:11 ` John Robinson
2011-07-17 12:22 ` Iustin Pop
2011-07-17 12:51 ` John Robinson
2011-07-17 13:28 ` Iustin Pop
2011-07-18 9:04 ` John Robinson [this message]
2011-07-17 22:05 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-27 5:42 ` Simon Matthews
2011-07-27 5:46 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-07-27 10:22 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-27 10:26 ` John Robinson
2011-07-27 12:35 ` Joe Landman
2011-07-27 13:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-17 23:03 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-18 11:52 ` Pol Hallen
2011-07-21 17:07 ` standard performance (write speed ??Mb/s) - new raid5 array Pol Hallen
2011-07-22 0:05 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-22 7:08 ` Pol Hallen
2011-07-22 8:13 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-17 16:48 ` standard performance (write speed 20Mb/s) Gordon Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-18 12:03 Pol Hallen
2011-07-20 12:31 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-20 20:02 ` Pol Hallen
[not found] ` <CADNH=7HR7euaWem0tpLxJfRe0hYnRP5fwxJ6MC5vJeNf=T=PzA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-21 0:02 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-07-21 6:57 ` Mathias Burén
2011-07-21 8:55 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-21 15:06 ` Paweł Brodacki
2011-07-21 15:30 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-21 15:42 ` Erwan Leroux
2011-07-25 6:39 ` Paweł Brodacki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E23F736.30601@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).