linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner" <st0ff@gmx.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: hochglanz@googlemail.com, hochglanz@gmail.com,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Device utilization with RAID-1
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:44:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4CB4CD.1010009@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110818114205.61aaa454@notabene.brown>

Am 18.08.2011 03:42, schrieb NeilBrown:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:26:17 +0200 Harald Nikolisin <hochglanz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> hi,
>>
>> I didn't want to complain in general about SW RAID-1 performance. I
>> simply think something is wrong with my setup and I have currently no
>> idea how to improve.
>>
>> The basic questions (where I did not find an answer, neither in FAQ's
>> nor in forum discussions) are.
>> a) Is it normal that the hard drives show an permanent utilization
>> (around 20%) without any noticeable actions on the computer?
> 
> No.  If the array is resyncing or recovering then you would expect
> utilization for as many hours as it takes - but that would show
> in /proc/mdstat.
> 
>> b) Should (as long as no resync happens) the state of mdadm active or clean?
> 
> If anything has been written to the device in the last 200msec (including
> e.g. access time updates) then expect it to be 'active'.
> If nothing has been written for 200msecc or more, then expect it to be clean.
> 
> If you crash while it is active, a resync is needed.
> If you crash while it is clean, no resync is needed.
> If you don't crash at all .... that is best :-)
> 
> NeilBrown
> 

I second that ;)  Have you checked the SMART-Attributes of your disks,
are they still OK?  But if they weren't, you wouldn't see that they're a
bit more busy, you'd only feel it from bad performance.

Indeed I think you need to find out which processes create your I/O
load, as it seems to be kind of a badly configured service/daemon which
slows down your whole computer that way... It's probably a good idea to
start with dstat and a wide screen :)

Stefan

> 
> 
>>
>> cheers,
>>   harald
>>
>> well, I have only 2 hard drives and no space for more..
>>
>> Am 16.08.2011 03:29, schrieb Roberto Spadim:
>>> try raid10 far layout
>>>
>>> 2011/8/15 Harald Nikolisin <hochglanz@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:hochglanz@gmail.com>>
>>>
>>>     Since a long time I'm unhappy with the performance of my RAID-1 system.
>>>     Investigation with atop and iostat unveils that the disk utilization is
>>>     always on a certain level although nothing happens on the system. In the
>>>     case of reading or writing files the utilization boosts always to 100%
>>>     for a long time. Very ugly examples are "Firefox starting" or "zypper
>>>     updates".
>>>     That is snapshot of the output of iostat:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Device:         rrqm/s   wrqm/s     r/s     w/s   rsec/s   wsec/s
>>>     avgrq-sz avgqu-sz   await  svctm  %util
>>>     sda               0,00     0,00    0,00    7,33     0,00    43,33
>>>     5,91     0,33   43,18  33,32  24,43
>>>     sdb               0,00     0,00    0,00    7,33     0,00    43,33
>>>     5,91     0,35   45,59  39,73  29,13
>>>     md0               0,00     0,00    0,00    0,67     0,00     5,33
>>>     8,00     0,00    0,00   0,00   0,00
>>>     md1               0,00     0,00    0,00    0,33     0,00     5,33
>>>     16,00     0,00    0,00   0,00   0,00
>>>     md2               0,00     0,00    0,00    0,33     0,00     1,00
>>>     3,00     0,00    0,00   0,00   0,00
>>>     md3               0,00     0,00    0,00    0,00     0,00     0,00
>>>     0,00     0,00    0,00   0,00   0,00
>>>     md4               0,00     0,00    0,00    0,00     0,00     0,00
>>>     0,00     0,00    0,00   0,00   0,00
>>>     md5               0,00     0,00    0,00    0,33     0,00     0,67
>>>     2,00     0,00    0,00   0,00   0,00
>>>
>>>     I checked with mdadm if a resync happens or so, but this is not the
>>>     case. The state says "active" on all RAID devices - btw. what is the
>>>     difference to "clean" ?
>>>
>>>     thanks for any hints,
>>>      harald
>>>     --
>>>     To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>>>     the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>     <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>
>>>     More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Roberto Spadim
>>> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-18  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-18  0:26 Fwd: Re: Device utilization with RAID-1 Harald Nikolisin
2011-08-18  1:42 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-18  6:44   ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner [this message]
2011-08-18 13:44   ` CoolCold
2011-08-19  0:31     ` NeilBrown
2011-08-19 18:32       ` maurice
2011-08-20  3:13         ` John Robinson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16  0:39 Harald Nikolisin
2011-08-16  1:30 ` Roberto Spadim
     [not found] ` <CABYL=TqYhDSFTx9Bq6_AWZaYd+qtbd=tJyTHJUjXwYHH_qkQnQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-16 17:25   ` Harald Nikolisin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E4CB4CD.1010009@gmx.net \
    --to=st0ff@gmx.net \
    --cc=hochglanz@gmail.com \
    --cc=hochglanz@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=st0ff@npl.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).