From: "Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner" <st0ff@gmx.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: hochglanz@googlemail.com, hochglanz@gmail.com,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Device utilization with RAID-1
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:44:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4CB4CD.1010009@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110818114205.61aaa454@notabene.brown>
Am 18.08.2011 03:42, schrieb NeilBrown:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:26:17 +0200 Harald Nikolisin <hochglanz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> I didn't want to complain in general about SW RAID-1 performance. I
>> simply think something is wrong with my setup and I have currently no
>> idea how to improve.
>>
>> The basic questions (where I did not find an answer, neither in FAQ's
>> nor in forum discussions) are.
>> a) Is it normal that the hard drives show an permanent utilization
>> (around 20%) without any noticeable actions on the computer?
>
> No. If the array is resyncing or recovering then you would expect
> utilization for as many hours as it takes - but that would show
> in /proc/mdstat.
>
>> b) Should (as long as no resync happens) the state of mdadm active or clean?
>
> If anything has been written to the device in the last 200msec (including
> e.g. access time updates) then expect it to be 'active'.
> If nothing has been written for 200msecc or more, then expect it to be clean.
>
> If you crash while it is active, a resync is needed.
> If you crash while it is clean, no resync is needed.
> If you don't crash at all .... that is best :-)
>
> NeilBrown
>
I second that ;) Have you checked the SMART-Attributes of your disks,
are they still OK? But if they weren't, you wouldn't see that they're a
bit more busy, you'd only feel it from bad performance.
Indeed I think you need to find out which processes create your I/O
load, as it seems to be kind of a badly configured service/daemon which
slows down your whole computer that way... It's probably a good idea to
start with dstat and a wide screen :)
Stefan
>
>
>>
>> cheers,
>> harald
>>
>> well, I have only 2 hard drives and no space for more..
>>
>> Am 16.08.2011 03:29, schrieb Roberto Spadim:
>>> try raid10 far layout
>>>
>>> 2011/8/15 Harald Nikolisin <hochglanz@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:hochglanz@gmail.com>>
>>>
>>> Since a long time I'm unhappy with the performance of my RAID-1 system.
>>> Investigation with atop and iostat unveils that the disk utilization is
>>> always on a certain level although nothing happens on the system. In the
>>> case of reading or writing files the utilization boosts always to 100%
>>> for a long time. Very ugly examples are "Firefox starting" or "zypper
>>> updates".
>>> That is snapshot of the output of iostat:
>>>
>>>
>>> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s
>>> avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
>>> sda 0,00 0,00 0,00 7,33 0,00 43,33
>>> 5,91 0,33 43,18 33,32 24,43
>>> sdb 0,00 0,00 0,00 7,33 0,00 43,33
>>> 5,91 0,35 45,59 39,73 29,13
>>> md0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,67 0,00 5,33
>>> 8,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> md1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,33 0,00 5,33
>>> 16,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> md2 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,33 0,00 1,00
>>> 3,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> md3 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> md4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>> md5 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,33 0,00 0,67
>>> 2,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
>>>
>>> I checked with mdadm if a resync happens or so, but this is not the
>>> case. The state says "active" on all RAID devices - btw. what is the
>>> difference to "clean" ?
>>>
>>> thanks for any hints,
>>> harald
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Roberto Spadim
>>> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 0:26 Fwd: Re: Device utilization with RAID-1 Harald Nikolisin
2011-08-18 1:42 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-18 6:44 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner [this message]
2011-08-18 13:44 ` CoolCold
2011-08-19 0:31 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-19 18:32 ` maurice
2011-08-20 3:13 ` John Robinson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16 0:39 Harald Nikolisin
2011-08-16 1:30 ` Roberto Spadim
[not found] ` <CABYL=TqYhDSFTx9Bq6_AWZaYd+qtbd=tJyTHJUjXwYHH_qkQnQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-16 17:25 ` Harald Nikolisin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4CB4CD.1010009@gmx.net \
--to=st0ff@gmx.net \
--cc=hochglanz@gmail.com \
--cc=hochglanz@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=st0ff@npl.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).