From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aapo Laine Subject: Re: potentially lost largeish raid5 array.. Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:00:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8898C4.8060803@shiftmail.org> References: <201109221950.36910.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <20110923151108.08c1199f@notabene.brown> <201109222322.57040.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <201109230209.36209.thomas@fjellstrom.ca> <20110923191539.110b7be1@notabene.brown> <4E7E5266.5040205@shiftmail.org> <20110925201025.53bc87f7@notabene.brown> <4E87A06E.6080109@shiftmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <4E87A06E.6080109@shiftmail.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kristleifur_Da=F0ason?= Cc: linux-raid List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 10/02/11 01:21, Aapo Laine wrote: > Actually we could even open a new mailing list or maybe there is > something better in web 2.0, like a wiki, for these MD code > explanations. Explanations in a wiki can be longer, there can be user > discussions, and such lines of comments do not need to be pushed as > far as Linus. Sorry, I wrote this before reading other replies. Kristleifur already proposed what might be optimal, that is, GitHub > I think concentrating all code explanation requests, discussions, > and/or at least the answers, onto something like a wiki could prevent > double-questions. Unfortunately I know nothing about wikis or other > web 2.0 technologies. Maybe someone in this ML can suggest a solution? Ditto +1 on the github