From: Gilbert Kowarzyk <kowarzyk@grm.polymtl.ca>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Renaming MD devices (metadata=1.1)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:08:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0E248E.1020705@grm.polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112100426.4c4656c8@notabene.brown>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Awesome!
Thanks for the info!
Gilbert
On 12-01-11 6:04 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:01:33 -0500 Gilbert Kowarzyk
> <kowarzyk@grm.polymtl.ca> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>
>> Hello,
>
>>>> Why do we have these choices, and when should each be used?
>>>
>>> 1.0 (at the end) is best for RAID1 when booting from the device
>>> as the boot-load just doesn't see the RAID at all.
>>>
>>> 1.1 (at the start) is generally good because various different
>>> things have metadata at the start, so there is no chance of
>>> confusion about what is using that devices - each possible
>>> users will overwrite the metadata of the others. It is also
>>> easier to make the devices larger if you don't need to move the
>>> metadata.
>>>
>>> 1.2 (4K from the start) has most of the benefits for 1.1 but
>>> works for booting with newer boot loaders - they still want
>>> sector 0 for a boot sector but understand the md superblock.
>
>> I see. Makes also loads of sense.
>
>> I had two more quick questions:
>
>> 1.- when would one want to turn off bitmaps? I turned them on,
>> but I haven't found why one may want them off (or for what they
>> should be turned off).
>
> There can be a performance impact - writes can be a bit slower with
> bitmaps. If that is more important to you that resync speed after a
> crash you might turn them off. To change the chunk-size of the
> bitmap you need to turn them off, then on again. If you want to
> reshape the array you currently need to turn the bitmap off first
> (because the bitmap doesn't automatically resize). You turn the
> bitmap off with mdadm --grow /dev/mdXX --bitmap=none
>
>
>> 2.- if I ever have a mismatch_cnt different than zero, how would
>> I go about finding which drive has the correct info, which was
>> the one that got corrupted, and how to obtain the correct one?
>
> "correct" is not a well defined concept here.
>
>> In the past I've changed the "CHECK" to "REPAIR" in the
>> configuration script that checks the RAID arrays periodically
>> (/etc/sysconfig/raid-check), but from what I understood it's a
>> bit of luck which one the automatic script will choose out of the
>> two drives (assuming raid1). Should I let it be automatic (with
>> "repair"), and if not (if I have to check which one is correct
>> manually), where could I find information to read about how to do
>> this (I am assuming the answer may be long)?
>
> This: http://neil.brown.name/blog/20100211050355 touches on the
> topic ... and is long.
>
>
> NeilBrown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: digital signature
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8OJIsACgkQOYVp1RpLsmUE5QCfduzOuF9EPCJoUbXWsq0kYhZF
OioAnichYkAyv8r1VLdcMoDSU2aiGF0Q
=44rt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-12 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 6:12 Renaming MD devices (metadata=1.1) Gilbert Kowarzyk
2012-01-10 10:59 ` Michal Soltys
2012-01-11 6:07 ` Gilbert Kowarzyk
2012-01-11 6:20 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-11 6:39 ` Gilbert Kowarzyk
2012-01-11 7:03 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-11 16:01 ` Gilbert Kowarzyk
2012-01-11 23:04 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-12 0:08 ` Gilbert Kowarzyk [this message]
2012-01-10 12:49 ` Phil Turmel
2012-01-11 6:23 ` Renaming MD devices (metadata=1.1) [SOLVED] Gilbert Kowarzyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0E248E.1020705@grm.polymtl.ca \
--to=kowarzyk@grm.polymtl.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=soltys@ziu.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox