From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Work around gcc-4.7's strict aliasing checks
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:21:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4F103DD5.4090402@ziu.info>
References: <1325762201-23949-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>	<1325762201-23949-2-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <20120112104320.471910db@notabene.brown> <4F0E8873.8040900@hesbynett.no> <4F0EE3F3.9050906@ziu.info> <4F1021A3.6020203@westcontrol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F1021A3.6020203@westcontrol.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Brown <david@westcontrol.com>
Cc: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, dledford@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On 13.01.2012 13:20, David Brown wrote:
>>
>> OTOH: __attribute__((__may_alias__)) should(?) always give consistent
>> (expected) results with type definitions that are used as aliases.
>> Maybe it would be better to go by this route.
>
> I couldn't find that attribute in the gcc manual.

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Attributes.html#Type-Attributes

Near the bottom of the page.