From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lennart Poettering Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add --initrd argument to mdadm Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:13:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1DBF6F.40209@redhat.com> References: <1326797330-4488-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <1326797330-4488-3-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <20120122221758.412b18d4@notabene.brown> <4F1D358C.9070508@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F1D358C.9070508@redhat.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jes Sorensen Cc: NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com, kay@redhat.com, harald@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids Heya, On 23.01.2012 11:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> I'm open to suggestions, but I'm not seeing --initrd as the best choice just >> yet. > > I was trying to come up with a better name, and I think --preboot is the > best I have seen so far. Other ideas I had were: > --systemd-root > --no-shutdown > however I like --preboot better, so I will go with that, unless someone > starts throwing things at me. I figure it's a bit of bike-shedding, but I'd like to ask you to stick to --initramfs or so if possible, simply because we're interested to reuse the same name for that switch for all storage daemons which need this, and the spec currently suggests --initramfs, and I'd prefer to avoid notifying all users of that change if we change it... Lennart