From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add --initrd argument to mdadm Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:53:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1FDF41.6000909@redhat.com> References: <1326797330-4488-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <1326797330-4488-3-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <20120122221758.412b18d4@notabene.brown> <4F1D358C.9070508@redhat.com> <4F1DBF6F.40209@redhat.com> <1327351849.6323.9.camel@mop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1327351849.6323.9.camel@mop> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: Kay Sievers , Lennart Poettering , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com, harald@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 01/23/12 21:50, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 21:13 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On 23.01.2012 11:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: >>> I was trying to come up with a better name, and I think --preboot is the >>> best I have seen so far. Other ideas I had were: >>> --systemd-root >>> --no-shutdown >>> however I like --preboot better, so I will go with that, unless someone >>> starts throwing things at me. >> >> I figure it's a bit of bike-shedding, but I'd like to ask you to stick >> to --initramfs or so if possible, simply because we're interested to >> reuse the same name for that switch for all storage daemons which need >> this, and the spec currently suggests --initramfs, and I'd prefer to >> avoid notifying all users of that change if we change it... > > Last time you and I decided to rename it to --initrd, so the document > does not say --initramfs. > > Back to square one. :) Neil, In the light of the discussion so far, do you have any preference for --preboot/--preroot/--initrd/--offroot Cheers, Jes