From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stan Hoeppner Subject: Re: XFS on top RAID10 with odd drives count and 2 near copies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:46:17 -0600 Message-ID: <4F392239.2070208@hardwarefreak.com> References: <4F35E925.6000003@hardwarefreak.com> <4F38FD5D.1010201@hardwarefreak.com> <4F39052C.1080409@westcontrol.com> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F39052C.1080409@westcontrol.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: CoolCold , Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 2/13/2012 6:42 AM, David Brown wrote: > OpenVZ is great for many purposes, but one unfortunate point is that > because it is based on patches to a number of key parts of the kernel, > it is only rarely re-synced to new kernels. It is currently stuck on > 2.6.32, which means he can't use this feature (and nor can I - I also > use OpenVZ and sometimes XFS, though I'm not too bothered about > squeezing the last drops of performance out of the system). RHEL 6.2 has all of the XFS improvements. If there is an OpenVZ for Red Hat 6.2? -- Stan