linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>
To: Steven Haigh <netwiz@crc.id.au>
Cc: stan@hardwarefreak.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Speeding up chunk size change?
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:37:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F52D565.7040604@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F52D320.4080206@crc.id.au>

On 03/04/2012 03:27 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 4/03/2012 1:24 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 3/3/2012 6:56 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>> On 4/03/2012 8:42 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>>> blockdev --setra 8192 /dev/sd[abcdefg]
>>>>
>>>> Read-ahead is per file descriptor, and occurs at the filesystem level.
>>>> The read-ahead value used is that of the device immediately underlying
>>>> the filessytem. So don't bother setting these above.
>>>
>>> Interesting - I didn't think that was the case for whole disk arrays -
>>> but there you go... Learnt something else :)
>> [snip]
>>>>> echo 4096> /sys/block/$i/queue/read_ahead_kb
>>>> Eliminate this line ^^^^
>>>
>>> Any insight into why? I would have thought that this would help -
>>> however I'm not quite sure as to the values - as this is much less than
>>> one chunk... That also being said, wouldn't it be a good idea to have
>>> *some* readahead?
>>
>> You read the answer up above, and commented on it. Maybe you didn't
>> fully understand? Or maybe it's because you don't know that these two
>> are functionally equivalent?
>>
>> blockdev --setra X
>> echo X> /sys/block/$i/queue/read_ahead_kb
>
> Ahhh - you're spot on... I didn't think they had the same functionality!
>

Btw, /sys/block/$i/queue/read_ahead_kb is deprecated, as its not a 
kernel-internal queue setting, but rather bdi (backing device) related.
So /sys/block/$i/bdi/read_ahead_kb is recommended to be used (I guess 
queue/read_ahead_kb will go away sometime in the future). In 
/sys/class/bdi you can even control read-head of non-block device file 
systems.

Cheers,
Bernd

      reply	other threads:[~2012-03-04  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-03 19:36 Speeding up chunk size change? Steven Haigh
2012-03-03 21:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-04  0:56   ` Steven Haigh
2012-03-04  2:24     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-03-04  2:27       ` Steven Haigh
2012-03-04  2:37         ` Bernd Schubert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F52D565.7040604@fastmail.fm \
    --to=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netwiz@crc.id.au \
    --cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).