From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: "Brown, Neil" <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: re-adding a disk to a raid1 array with bitmap
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:07:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5A2ACE.4090003@redhat.com> (raw)
Neil,
I have been spinning my head over this for a bit trying to figure out
what is the right solution to this problem.
In bedd86b7773fd97f0d708cc0c371c8963ba7ba9a you added a test to reject
re-adding a drive to an array in some cases.
The problem I have been looking at is if one has a raid1 with a bitmap.
Basically in the situation where we have one of the drives pulled from
the array, then if I try to add it back, it fails like this:
[root@monkeybay ~]# mdadm -I --run /dev/sdf5
mdadm: failed to add /dev/sdf5 to /dev/md32: Invalid argument.
However this works:
[root@monkeybay ~]# mdadm -a /dev/md32 /dev/sdf5
mdadm: re-added /dev/sdf5
I dug through the kernel and it shows up that the failure is due to this
test in the above mentioned commit:
+ rdev->raid_disk != info->raid_disk)) {
So basically when doing -I it seems the disk itself expects to be
raid_disk = 0, whereas the kernel expects it should be raid_disk = 1.
I agree with the previous discussion that it makes sense to reject a
drive in the normal case without a bitmap. However it seems illogical to
me that -a works but -I should fail in this case.
What would be the right fix here? Relaxing the test in the kernel to not
require the raid_disk numbers match up for a bitmap raid, or should
mdadm be taught to examine the raids and set the expected disk number
before submitting the add_new_disk ioctl?
Cheers,
Jes
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-09 16:07 Jes Sorensen [this message]
2012-03-28 0:40 ` re-adding a disk to a raid1 array with bitmap NeilBrown
2012-03-28 15:17 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5A2ACE.4090003@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).