From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stan Hoeppner Subject: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 04:07:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4F66F74D.3030909@hardwarefreak.com> References: <4F61803A.60009@hardwarefreak.com> <20321.63389.586851.689070@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> <4F64115D.50208@hardwarefreak.com> <20120317223454.GQ5091@dastard> <20325.17387.216150.45013@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> <20325.50714.237894.328039@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> <20120318140051.GA2594@infradead.org> <20326.13500.799169.828158@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20326.13500.799169.828158@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Grandi Cc: Linux RAID , Linux fs XFS List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 3/18/2012 2:17 PM, Peter Grandi wrote: > It is noticeable that 90% of your post is pure malicious > offtopic personal attack, and the rest is "from on high", > and the whole is entirely devoid of technical content. It is noticeable that 100% of my post was technical content, directly asked questions of you, yet you chose to respond to Christoph's "personal attacks" while avoiding answering my purely technical questions. I guess we can assume your silence, your unwillingness to answer my questions, is a sign of capitulation. -- Stan