linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [md PATCH 08/23] md: don't set md arrays to readonly on shutdown.
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:26:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F918E3A.8090506@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120419195740.6e35ea02@notabene.brown>

On 19/04/2012 10:57, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:11:43 +0300 Alexander Lyakas<alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>> However, from your commit message, it stems that during a normal
>> reboot (without -f -n), writes can still arrive after your reboot
>> notifier has cleaned the array. In such case, array might be dirty
>> after reboot. Is that so? If yes, then that's kind of regression.
>
> Why do you think that?
>
> I don't think that is the case.

That's what I had thought too, because in your original message 
describing the patch, you wrote:

> It seems that with recent kernel, writeback can still be happening
> while shutdown is happening, and consequently data can be written
> after the md reboot notifier switches all arrays to read-only.

I understand that to mean that someone somewhere has patched the kernel 
so that writes (writeback?) can still be happening after the array is 
supposed to be read-only. This sounds like a regression to me, though 
not one you have created.

Cheers,

John.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-20 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-14  4:40 [md PATCH 00/23] md patches heading for 3.4 NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 03/23] md/raid5: removed unused 'added_devices' variable NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 06/23] md: allow last device to be forcibly removed from RAID1/RAID10 NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 01/23] md/raid5: make sure reshape_position is cleared on error path NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 05/23] md/raid5: use atomic_dec_return() instead of atomic_dec() and atomic_read() NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 02/23] md/raid10: remove unnecessary smp_mb() from end_sync_write NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 04/23] md: Use existed macros instead of numbers NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 09/23] md/bitmap: ensure to load bitmap when creating via sysfs NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 12/23] md: add proper merge_bvec handling to RAID0 and Linear NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 14/23] md/raid1: handle merge_bvec_fn in member devices NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 08/23] md: don't set md arrays to readonly on shutdown NeilBrown
2012-04-18 15:37   ` Alexander Lyakas
2012-04-18 17:44     ` Paweł Brodacki
2012-04-18 20:53       ` Alexander Lyakas
2012-04-18 22:48     ` NeilBrown
2012-04-19  9:11       ` Alexander Lyakas
2012-04-19  9:57         ` NeilBrown
2012-04-20 11:30           ` Paweł Brodacki
2012-04-20 12:01             ` NeilBrown
2012-04-21 15:18               ` Paweł Brodacki
2012-04-21 20:42                 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-30 10:32                   ` Paweł Brodacki
2012-04-20 16:26           ` John Robinson [this message]
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 10/23] md/raid1, raid10: avoid deadlock during resync/recovery NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 13/23] md/raid10: handle merge_bvec_fn in member devices NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 11/23] md: tidy up rdev_for_each usage NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 07/23] md: allow re-add to failed arrays NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 19/23] md/bitmap: remove some pointless locking NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 21/23] md/bitmap: discard CHUNK_BLOCK_SHIFT macro NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 17/23] md/bitmap: move printing of bitmap status to bitmap.c NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 18/23] md/bitmap: change a 'goto' to a normal 'if' construct NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 22/23] md: fix clearing of the 'changed' flags for the bad blocks list NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 15/23] md/raid10 - support resizing some RAID10 arrays NeilBrown
2012-03-14  6:17   ` keld
2012-03-14  6:27     ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14  7:51       ` David Brown
2012-03-14  8:32         ` NeilBrown
2012-03-14 10:20           ` David Brown
2012-03-14 12:37             ` keld
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 16/23] md/bitmap: remove some unused noise from bitmap.h NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 20/23] md/bitmap: remove unnecessary indirection when allocating NeilBrown
2012-03-14  4:40 ` [md PATCH 23/23] md: Add judgement bb->unacked_exist in function md_ack_all_badblocks() NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F918E3A.8090506@anonymous.org.uk \
    --to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
    --cc=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).