linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Spannbauer <ds@marco.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:46:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F96BCC9.9080003@marco.de> (raw)

Hello,

at the moment I'm trying to find a bottleneck on my lamp-server with
opensuse 11.4 (Kernel 2.6.37.6)

Sometimes the system has a very poor performance because of a high io-wait.
If I watch the systems disk-access with "atop -dD" I can see that sda is
the most of the time at a load of 10%, sdb sometimes is at 100% or
higher at the same time.

In my opinion in a Raid1-System both disk should have nearly the same load.

Or may I wrong whis this?

Both harddisks where changed 3 Weeks ago, /proc/mdstat shows that the
rebuild was successfull and the array is functional. Today I've changed
th SATA-Cable and the Port on the Maindboard of sdb, but the behaviour
is still the same. Both disks passed the extended smart-self-test.

Any ideas about that?

Regards

Daniel



-- 
Daniel Spannbauer                         Software Entwicklung
marco Systemanalyse und Entwicklung GmbH  Tel   +49 8333 9233-27 Fax -11
Rechbergstr. 4 - 6, D 87727 Babenhausen   Mobil +49 171 4033220
http://www.marco.de/                      Email ds@marco.de
Geschäftsführer Martin Reuter             HRB 171775 Amtsgericht München
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-24 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-24 14:46 Daniel Spannbauer [this message]
     [not found] ` <CABYL=To=tK8a0DVjvYeyuA2K4xChE3hv7Ppx+VvBTYfeZGgsjQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-24 15:02   ` Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda Daniel Spannbauer
2012-04-24 15:04     ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-24 15:03 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-25  7:47 ` Kay Diederichs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F96BCC9.9080003@marco.de \
    --to=ds@marco.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).