From: Daniel Spannbauer <ds@marco.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F96BCC9.9080003@marco.de> (raw)
Hello,
at the moment I'm trying to find a bottleneck on my lamp-server with
opensuse 11.4 (Kernel 2.6.37.6)
Sometimes the system has a very poor performance because of a high io-wait.
If I watch the systems disk-access with "atop -dD" I can see that sda is
the most of the time at a load of 10%, sdb sometimes is at 100% or
higher at the same time.
In my opinion in a Raid1-System both disk should have nearly the same load.
Or may I wrong whis this?
Both harddisks where changed 3 Weeks ago, /proc/mdstat shows that the
rebuild was successfull and the array is functional. Today I've changed
th SATA-Cable and the Port on the Maindboard of sdb, but the behaviour
is still the same. Both disks passed the extended smart-self-test.
Any ideas about that?
Regards
Daniel
--
Daniel Spannbauer Software Entwicklung
marco Systemanalyse und Entwicklung GmbH Tel +49 8333 9233-27 Fax -11
Rechbergstr. 4 - 6, D 87727 Babenhausen Mobil +49 171 4033220
http://www.marco.de/ Email ds@marco.de
Geschäftsführer Martin Reuter HRB 171775 Amtsgericht München
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 14:46 Daniel Spannbauer [this message]
[not found] ` <CABYL=To=tK8a0DVjvYeyuA2K4xChE3hv7Ppx+VvBTYfeZGgsjQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-24 15:02 ` Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda Daniel Spannbauer
2012-04-24 15:04 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-24 15:03 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-25 7:47 ` Kay Diederichs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F96BCC9.9080003@marco.de \
--to=ds@marco.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).