From: Kay Diederichs <kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F97AC28.7060609@uni-konstanz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F96BCC9.9080003@marco.de>
On 04/24/2012 04:46 PM, Daniel Spannbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> at the moment I'm trying to find a bottleneck on my lamp-server with
> opensuse 11.4 (Kernel 2.6.37.6)
>
> Sometimes the system has a very poor performance because of a high io-wait.
> If I watch the systems disk-access with "atop -dD" I can see that sda is
> the most of the time at a load of 10%, sdb sometimes is at 100% or
> higher at the same time.
>
> In my opinion in a Raid1-System both disk should have nearly the same load.
>
> Or may I wrong whis this?
>
> Both harddisks where changed 3 Weeks ago, /proc/mdstat shows that the
> rebuild was successfull and the array is functional. Today I've changed
> th SATA-Cable and the Port on the Maindboard of sdb, but the behaviour
> is still the same. Both disks passed the extended smart-self-test.
>
> Any ideas about that?
>
> Regards
>
> Daniel
Are the disks more or less the same in all SMART attributes (from
smartctl -a)?
I have seen such a behaviour in the case of one disk being marginal,
and/or having a couple of bad spots which need several trials to be
read. This always also resulted in longer "smartctl -t long" times than
usual, but did not always show up clearly in the SMART output (or I
looked at the wrong attributes).
I'd try to exchange the disk.
HTH,
Kay
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 14:46 Raid1: sdb has a lot mor work then sda Daniel Spannbauer
[not found] ` <CABYL=To=tK8a0DVjvYeyuA2K4xChE3hv7Ppx+VvBTYfeZGgsjQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-24 15:02 ` Daniel Spannbauer
2012-04-24 15:04 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-24 15:03 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-04-25 7:47 ` Kay Diederichs [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F97AC28.7060609@uni-konstanz.de \
--to=kay.diederichs@uni-konstanz.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).