From: Richard Scobie <r.scobie@clear.net.nz>
To: Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: md RAID with enterprise-class SATA or SAS drives
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:29:42 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAB1A06.10502@clear.net.nz> (raw)
Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au> wrote:
> ignoring the better MTBF and seek times of these drives, do any of the
> other features passively contribute to a better RAID experience when
> using md?
An important one for large arrays is the ability to handle the level of
chassis vibration/resonance from adjacent drives, which has a marked
effect on seek times (this feature is called RAFF in Western Digital
RAID Edition drives), and is not available in desktop drives.
Regards,
Richard
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-10 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 1:29 Richard Scobie [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-09 22:00 md RAID with enterprise-class SATA or SAS drives Daniel Pocock
2012-05-09 22:33 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 13:34 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 13:51 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 14:59 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 15:15 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 15:26 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 16:04 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 17:53 ` Keith Keller
2012-05-10 18:10 ` Mathias Burén
2012-05-10 18:23 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 19:15 ` Keith Keller
2012-05-10 18:42 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 19:09 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 20:30 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 6:50 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-05-21 14:19 ` Brian Candler
2012-05-21 14:29 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-26 21:58 ` Stefan *St0fF* Huebner
2012-05-10 21:43 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-10 23:00 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 21:15 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-10 21:31 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 1:53 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-11 8:31 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 13:54 ` Pierre Beck
2012-05-10 21:41 ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 22:27 ` David Brown
2012-05-10 22:37 ` Daniel Pocock
[not found] ` <CABYL=ToORULrdhBVQk0K8zQqFYkOomY-wgG7PpnJnzP9u7iBnA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-11 7:10 ` David Brown
2012-05-11 8:16 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 22:28 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 15:20 ` CoolCold
2012-05-21 18:51 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 18:54 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-21 19:05 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 19:38 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-21 23:34 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-22 6:36 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-22 7:29 ` David Brown
2012-05-23 13:14 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-23 13:27 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-23 19:49 ` David Brown
2012-05-23 23:46 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24 1:18 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24 2:08 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-24 6:16 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24 2:10 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-24 2:55 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-11 22:17 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAB1A06.10502@clear.net.nz \
--to=r.scobie@clear.net.nz \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).