linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
Cc: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: md RAID with enterprise-class SATA or SAS drives
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:15:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAC2FF2.5060305@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FABC7C6.4030107@turmel.org>

On 5/10/2012 8:51 AM, Phil Turmel wrote:

> Hardware RAID cards usually offer battery-backed write cache, which is
> very valuable in some applications.  I don't have a need for that kind
> of performance, so I can't speak to the details.  (Is Stan H.
> listening?)

Yes, I'm here to drop the hammer, and start a flame war. ;)  I've been
lurking and trying to stay out of the fray, but you "keep dragging me
back in!" --Michael Corleone

I find the mere existence of this thread a bit comical, as with all
others that have preceded it.  I made the comment on this list quite
some time ago that md raid is mostly used by hobbyists, and took a lot
of heat for that.  The existence of this thread adds ammunition to that
argument.

If not for the fact Western Digital added "TLER" to the spec sheet of
it's RE and Raptor series drives many years ago, nobody would have every
mentioned it.

WD did this because those in the "channel" marketplace weren't buying
the drives.  They saw no difference with these new "enterprise" drives
but the much higher price.  WD has never sold RE/Raptor drives to
server/storage OEMs.  WD has never had a presence in enterprise storage.
 Seagate, Hitachi/IBM, Fujitsu, and to a small degree Toshiba, have
owned that space for over a decade.

So in an attempt to drive sales, they added "TLER" to the sheet to
differentiate from their desktop drives.  So what happens?  All the
hobbyists immediately want to enable this "TLER" feature from the
"enterprise" drives on their consumer models, because "TLER" is all that
makes them "enterprise" drives, after all, "all WD drives are the same,
just with different firmware, right?".

Proof point:  Few write about this subject using the generic term "ERC",
which is used by Seagate, or the term Samsung uses, "CCTL".  Everyone
seems to talk about "TLER".  Hmmm...  Coincidence?  No, marketing.

You won't find a single discussion about ERC/TLER/CCTL on any enterprise
storage forum, unless its brought up by someone desiring to cut cost
corners using consumer drives.

So if md raid is not limited to use by hobbyists, and is indeed used in
enterprise environments, then why aren't the enterprise boys discussing
"the problems w/TLER and enterprise drives"?  Because obviously md raid
has no issues when being used with enterprise (ERC/TLER/CCTL) drives.

Either that, or md raid is only used by hobbyists. ;)

-- 
Stan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-10 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-09 22:00 md RAID with enterprise-class SATA or SAS drives Daniel Pocock
2012-05-09 22:33 ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 13:34   ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 13:51   ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 14:59     ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 15:15       ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 15:26     ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 16:04       ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 17:53         ` Keith Keller
2012-05-10 18:10           ` Mathias Burén
2012-05-10 18:23           ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 19:15             ` Keith Keller
2012-05-10 18:42         ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-10 19:09           ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 20:30             ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11  6:50             ` Michael Tokarev
2012-05-21 14:19           ` Brian Candler
2012-05-21 14:29             ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-26 21:58               ` Stefan *St0fF* Huebner
2012-05-10 21:43       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-10 23:00         ` Marcus Sorensen
2012-05-10 21:15     ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2012-05-10 21:31       ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11  1:53         ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-11  8:31           ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 13:54             ` Pierre Beck
2012-05-10 21:41       ` Phil Turmel
2012-05-10 22:27       ` David Brown
2012-05-10 22:37         ` Daniel Pocock
     [not found]         ` <CABYL=ToORULrdhBVQk0K8zQqFYkOomY-wgG7PpnJnzP9u7iBnA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-11  7:10           ` David Brown
2012-05-11  8:16             ` Daniel Pocock
2012-05-11 22:28               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 15:20                 ` CoolCold
2012-05-21 18:51                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 18:54                     ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-21 19:05                       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-21 19:38                         ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-21 23:34                     ` NeilBrown
2012-05-22  6:36                       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-22  7:29                         ` David Brown
2012-05-23 13:14                           ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-23 13:27                             ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-23 19:49                             ` David Brown
2012-05-23 23:46                               ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24  1:18                                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24  2:08                                   ` NeilBrown
2012-05-24  6:16                                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-05-24  2:10                         ` NeilBrown
2012-05-24  2:55                           ` Roberto Spadim
2012-05-11 22:17             ` Stan Hoeppner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-10  1:29 Richard Scobie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FAC2FF2.5060305@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=daniel@pocock.com.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip@turmel.org \
    --cc=shadowsor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).