From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.2.4 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4FB17212.3000308@redhat.com> References: <2598499.YYnUQlf0Se@localhost> <4FB16B68.3000201@redhat.com> <1714869.L4aqWfddyq@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1714869.L4aqWfddyq@localhost> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWCIFNpa29yYQ==?= Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 05/14/12 22:57, Pawe=C5=82 Sikora wrote: > On Monday 14 of May 2012 22:30:32 Jes Sorensen wrote: >> On 05/12/12 08:36, Pawe=C5=82 Sikora wrote: >>> fyi, this release contains a hidden strict-aliasing-violation bug [= 1]. >>> please fix this correctly or build mdadm with -fno-strict-aliasing = option. >>> >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg37298.html >> >> If you provide a patch, you're more likely to get the issue fixed th= an >> by just telling other people to fix it for you. >=20 > i have sent you a revert request with a proper fix 3 months ago > and you have finally rejected it with "invalid commit message", > so feel free to keep broken mdadm sources as long as you wish :> >=20 If you post a patch without including a proper commit message and signed-off-by lines, which is standard practice, then that is equivalen= t to you not having posted a patch in the first place. Don't blame others for not doing the basic work everybody else does whe= n posting patches. It really isn't hard to comply with the standard patch posting rules! Jes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html