From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Beck Subject: Re: Data Offset Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:56:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD8D439.10406@pierre-beck.de> References: <20120602095237.3822e2c2@notabene.brown> <20120604133526.6da3bf10@notabene.brown> <4FCCFDBB.201@pierre-beck.de> <20120605085728.7e922359@notabene.brown> <20120605154427.192566af@notabene.brown> <20120610074531.65eaed81@notabene.brown> <4FD86179.1080209@pierre-beck.de> <4FD88C50.1000104@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FD88C50.1000104@turmel.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Turmel Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Am 13.06.2012 14:49, schrieb Phil Turmel: > > fsck -n is the *only* safe way to automate the check. Hex dumps of > expected signature blocks is even better, but is difficult to automate. The journal playback seemed less dangerous than fsck in general, but fsck -n is even better, agreed. Greetings, Pierre Beck