From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Beck Subject: Re: Data Offset Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:22:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD8DA4A.8030800@pierre-beck.de> References: <20120602095237.3822e2c2@notabene.brown> <20120604133526.6da3bf10@notabene.brown> <4FCCFDBB.201@pierre-beck.de> <20120605085728.7e922359@notabene.brown> <20120605154427.192566af@notabene.brown> <20120610074531.65eaed81@notabene.brown> <4FD86179.1080209@pierre-beck.de> <4FD88C50.1000104@turmel.org> <4FD8D439.10406@pierre-beck.de> <4FD8D7EE.5000805@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FD8D7EE.5000805@turmel.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Turmel Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids I wonder if LVM activation can be done without writing to the array? IIRC it updates at least some timestamp ... Am 13.06.2012 20:12, schrieb Phil Turmel: > It's not a question more or less dangerous. If the stripes are out of > order, writing to the array is destructive. Not only will the writes > probably land in the wrong place on the device, but writing triggers > recalculated parity, which also probably stomps on other data. >