linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Prager <linux@matthiasprager.de>
To: Robert Trace <maillist@farcaster.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthias Prager <linux@matthiasprager.de>
Subject: Re: 'Device not ready' issue on mpt2sas since 3.1.10
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:12:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFB7354.8040809@matthiasprager.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FFB32E5.1050109@farcaster.org>

Am 09.07.2012 21:37, schrieb Robert Trace:
>> I did some further research regarding my problem.
>> It appears to me the fault does not lie with the mpt2sas driver (not
>> that I can definitely exclude it), but with the md implementation.
> 
> I'm actually discovering some of the same issues (LSI 9211-8i w/ SATA
> disks), but I've come to a slightly different conclusion.
> 
> I noticed that when my SATA disks are on a SATA controller and they spin
> down (or are spun down via hdparm -y), then they response to TUR (TEST
> UNIT READY) commands with an OK.  Any I/O sent to these disks simply
> wait while the disks spin up and then complete as usual.
> 
> However, my SATA disks on the SAS controller respond to TUR with the
> sense error "Not Ready/Initializing command required".  Any I/O sent to
> these disks immediately fails.  You saw this in your logging:
> 
>> [  604.838640] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Device not ready
>> [  604.838645] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda]  Result: hostbyte=DID_OK
>> driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
>> [  604.838655] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda]  Sense Key : Not Ready [current]
>> [  604.838663] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda]  Add. Sense: Logical unit not ready,
>> initializing command required
>> [  604.838668] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 00 08 00 00 00
>> 20 00
>> [  604.838680] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 2048
>> [  604.838688] Buffer I/O error on device md127, logical block 0
>> [  604.838695] Buffer I/O error on device md127, logical block 1
>> [  604.838699] Buffer I/O error on device md127, logical block 2
>> [  604.838702] Buffer I/O error on device md127, logical block 3
> 
> Sending an explicit START UNIT command to these sleeping disks will wake
> them up and then they behave normally.  (BTW, you can issue TURs and
> START UNITs via the sg_turs and sg_start commands).
Thanks for these pointers.

> 
> I've reproduced this behavior on the raw disks themselves, no MD layer
> involved (although the freak-out by my MD layer is what alerted me to
> this issue too... Having your entire array punted the first time you
> access it is a little scary :-).  I'm also on raw hardware and I've seen
> this behavior on kernels 3.0.33 through 3.4.4.
This is interesting - are you sure about 3.0.33? I'm running this kernel
atm for it gives me no trouble (as opposed to >=3.1.10). The SATA disks
are spun up when I access data on them.

> 
> So, SATA disks respond differently depending on the controller they're
> on.  I don't know if this is a SCSI thing, a SAS thing or a
> firmware/driver thing for the 9211.
> 
> Now, whether or not the MD layer should be assembling arrays from
> "failed" disks is, I think, a separate issue.
I realize now in my cases the MD layer behaved correctly.

> 
> -- Rob
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4FE454CA.6080007@matthiasprager.de>
2012-07-09 14:40 ` 'Device not ready' issue on mpt2sas since 3.1.10 Matthias Prager
2012-07-09 19:37   ` Robert Trace
2012-07-09 20:45     ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-07-09 22:24       ` Robert Trace
2012-07-10  0:21         ` Matthias Prager
2012-07-10 16:54         ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-07-10  0:12     ` Matthias Prager [this message]
2012-07-09 22:08   ` NeilBrown
2012-07-10  0:03     ` Matthias Prager

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFB7354.8040809@matthiasprager.de \
    --to=linux@matthiasprager.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maillist@farcaster.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).