linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shinkichi Yamazaki <shinkichi.yamazaki@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Monitor: improve check_one_sharer() for checking duplicated process
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:27:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a177b2d-f054-cffc-f970-1ec63e74701a@trained-monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410162446.6292-1-colyli@suse.de>

On 4/10/20 12:24 PM, Coly Li wrote:
> When running mdadm monitor with scan mode, only one autorebuild process
> is allowed. check_one_sharer() checks duplicated process by following
> steps,
> 1) Read autorebuild.pid file,
>    - if file does not exist, no duplicated process, go to 3).
>    - if file exists, continue to next step.
> 2) Read pid number from autorebuild.pid file, then check procfs pid
>    directory /proc/<PID>,
>    - if the directory does not exist, no duplicated process, go to 3)
>    - if the directory exists, print error message for duplicated process
>      and exit this mdadm.
> 3) Write current pid into autorebuild.pid file, continue to monitor in
>    scan mode.
> 
> The problem for the above step 2) is, if after system reboots and
> another different process happens to have exact same pid number which
> autorebuild.pid file records, check_one_sharer() will treat it as a
> duplicated mdadm process and returns error with message "Only one
> autorebuild process allowed in scan mode, aborting".
> 
> This patch tries to fix the above same-pid-but-different-process issue
> by one more step to check the process command name,
> 1) Read autorebuild.pid file
>    - if file does not exist, no duplicated process, go to 4).
>    - if file exists, continue to next step.
> 2) Read pid number from autorebuild.pid file, then check procfs file
>    comm with the specific pid directory /proc/<PID>/comm
>    - if the file does not exit, it means the directory /proc/<PID> does
>      not exist, go to 4)
>    - if the file exits, continue next step
> 3) Read process command name from /proc/<PIC>/comm, compare the command
>    name with "mdadm" process name,
>    - if not equal, no duplicated process, goto 4)
>    - if strings are equal, print error message for duplicated process
>      and exit this mdadm.
> 4) Write current pid into autorebuild.pid file, continue to monitor in
>    scan mode.
> 
> Now check_one_sharer() returns error for duplicated process only when
> the recorded pid from autorebuild.pid exists, and the process has exact
> same command name as "mdadm".
> 
> Reported-by: Shinkichi Yamazaki <shinkichi.yamazaki@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> ---
>  Monitor.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-10 16:24 [PATCH] Monitor: improve check_one_sharer() for checking duplicated process Coly Li
2020-04-10 22:55 ` John Stoffel
2020-04-13  1:47 ` Zhong Lidong
2020-04-13  2:34   ` Coly Li
2020-04-27 14:27 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a177b2d-f054-cffc-f970-1ec63e74701a@trained-monkey.org \
    --to=jes@trained-monkey.org \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shinkichi.yamazaki@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).