From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@redhat.com>,
Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:30:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500CD349.5090500@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1897705147.341625.1342995720661.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Same issue likely.
On 7/22/2012 5:22 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
>>> Likewise, if the checksumming you request is implemented in
>>> md/RAID1,
>
> Btw. I like what Roberto proposed ... this could be a completely
> independent layer having it's own device file. MD RAID1 would
> be then built on top of such safe device files. The only thing
> to be implemented directly in the RAID1 would be that immediate
> resyncing in case of discovered read error received from such
> safety layer. And this immediate resyncing could/should be
> optional ...
>
> Jaromir.
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-23 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1897705147.341625.1342995720661.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-07-23 4:30 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
[not found] <1082734092.338339.1342995087426.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-07-23 4:29 ` [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-23 9:34 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-23 10:53 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-23 17:03 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-07-23 18:24 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-23 21:31 ` Drew
2012-07-23 21:42 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-24 4:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-24 12:51 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-27 6:06 ` Adam Goryachev
2012-07-27 13:42 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-24 15:09 ` Jaromir Capik
[not found] <17025a94-1999-4619-b23d-7460946c2f85@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2012-07-18 11:01 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 11:13 ` Mathias Burén
2012-07-18 12:42 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 11:15 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-18 13:04 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-19 3:48 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-20 12:53 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 18:24 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 18:30 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 20:07 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 20:21 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 20:44 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 20:59 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-21 3:58 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-07-18 11:49 ` keld
2012-07-18 13:08 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 16:08 ` Roberto Spadim
2012-07-20 10:35 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-18 21:02 ` keld
2012-07-18 16:28 ` Asdo
2012-07-20 11:07 ` Jaromir Capik
2012-07-20 11:14 ` Oliver Schinagl
2012-07-20 11:28 ` Jaromir Capik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500CD349.5090500@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=jcapik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).