From: "Sergiusz Brzeziński" <Sergiusz.Brzezinski@supersystem.pl>
To: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mdadm --monitor: need extra feature?
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5034BB35.2090102@supersystem.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034B993.3070000@supersystem.pl>
W dniu 22.08.2012 12:50, Sergiusz Brzeziński pisze:
> W dniu 22.08.2012 12:12, Adam Goryachev pisze:
>> On 22/08/12 19:50, Sergiusz Brzeziński wrote:
>>> 3. In Ubuntu there is in /lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid.rules file
>>> responsible for this. I only changed one line:
>>>
>>> ACTION=="add", RUN+="/sbin/mdadm --incremental $tempnode"
>>> to:
>>> ACTION=="add", RUN+="/sbin/mdadm --incremental --run $tempnode"
>>>
>>> And thats all!
>>>
>>> Now, I don't have to use my script from crontab anymore. Raid start
>>> rebuilding array immediately after disk is inserted.
>> Could this cause a problem (ie, what is the reason this is not the
>> default value)?
>>
>> My guess is it may cause md to start an array where all "available"
>> disks are not yet added to the array. ie, if you are plugging in three
>> drives, it might run the array after plugging in the second array, and
>> then when you plugin the third drive it will need to do a resync.
> >
> > I suppose worst case is a resync where it wasn't really needed.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Adam
>
> I made a try.
>
> 1.
> I never had before 3 drives at one time. After inserting the third drive for the
> first time (the drive had a raid partition with proper UUID) it happened
> nothing. (or maybye something happened but I don't know what because i turned
> off the debugging :( )
>
> 2.
> Than I made mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/third_drive
> It was added as a spare.
>
> 3.
> I removed and inserted again the third drive. Again nothing. No info in log, and
> it was not added as a spare.
>
> I don't know if it is good or wrong behawior (maybye the drive should appear
> automaticaly as a spare?) but for me it is not a problem because I don't use
> spares :)
CORRECTION: IT WAS AUTOMATICALY ADDED AS A SPARE
So I think it works as expected!
I did the test fast - I did probably a mistake checking that.
Sergiusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 10:41 mdadm --monitor: need extra feature? Sergiusz Brzeziński
2012-08-21 10:44 ` David Brown
2012-08-21 11:51 ` Sergiusz Brzeziński
2012-08-21 12:39 ` Adam Goryachev
2012-08-22 7:14 ` Sergiusz Brzeziński
2012-08-22 7:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-22 9:50 ` Sergiusz Brzeziński
[not found] ` <5034B0A2.4080403@websitemanagers.com.au>
2012-08-22 10:50 ` Sergiusz Brzeziński
2012-08-22 10:57 ` Sergiusz Brzeziński [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5034BB35.2090102@supersystem.pl \
--to=sergiusz.brzezinski@supersystem.pl \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).