* Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
@ 2012-08-19 7:42 Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-22 11:26 ` Jan Ceuleers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2012-08-19 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi
I recently upgraded my server from Ubuntu 11.04 to 11.10. Now the spares
are *usually* not added to my RAID sets upon reboot, although sometimes
they are.
I can re-add them manually. The way I do that is to check (using the
lsdrv script) what the current name is of the inactive components:
├─sde2: [8:66] MD raid1 (2) 517.72m inactive
{c2bfb80c-0cbf-5cd9-67c6-2432ead2ec0c}
└─sde3: [8:67] MD raid1 (2) 465.27g inactive
{442e9934-9719-1d8e-6d0c-f7a941621837}
These UUIDs correspond with those of the active components.
I then add them by issuing the following commands:
root@zotac:~# mdadm /dev/md0 --add /dev/sde2
mdadm: re-added /dev/sde2
root@zotac:~# mdadm /dev/md1 --add /dev/sde3
mdadm: re-added /dev/sde3
If necessary I can keep doing that and perhaps even automate it, but it
would of course be nicer if the boot scripts did this properly to begin
with.
For the first time ever I tried mdadm's incremental mode. So before
issuing the above two commands I tried the following;
root@zotac:~# mdadm -I /dev/sde2
mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
root@zotac:~# mdadm -I /dev/sde3
mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde3 to /dev/md1: Invalid argument.
Should this have worked, given that both arrays were already running at
the time? At the very least mdadm did recognise which array to add each
component to, but then failed to do so.
I've also got all of this in dmesg. This spans the above four commands
(so the two incremental commands followed by the two add commands).
[ 2565.636128] scsi_verify_blk_ioctl: 180 callbacks suppressed
[ 2565.636133] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.636137] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.650234] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.650239] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.650406] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.650411] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.661713] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.661717] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2565.662129] mdadm: sending ioctl 800c0910 to a partition!
[ 2565.662135] mdadm: sending ioctl 800c0910 to a partition!
[ 2587.811007] scsi_verify_blk_ioctl: 90 callbacks suppressed
[ 2587.811014] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811018] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811458] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811462] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811609] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811614] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811754] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811758] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2587.811908] mdadm: sending ioctl 800c0910 to a partition!
[ 2587.811912] mdadm: sending ioctl 800c0910 to a partition!
[ 2587.816893] md: export_rdev(sde2)
[ 2613.272894] scsi_verify_blk_ioctl: 12 callbacks suppressed
[ 2613.272898] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.272900] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273185] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273188] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273265] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273267] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273345] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273348] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2613.273433] mdadm: sending ioctl 800c0910 to a partition!
[ 2613.273436] mdadm: sending ioctl 800c0910 to a partition!
[ 2613.279607] md: export_rdev(sde3)
[ 2645.090983] scsi_verify_blk_ioctl: 12 callbacks suppressed
[ 2645.090986] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.090988] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.092538] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.092540] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.094318] md: bind<sde2>
[ 2645.154102] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.154108] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.161908] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2645.161914] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.141416] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.141422] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.144421] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.144426] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.150211] md: bind<sde3>
[ 2658.305418] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.305421] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.321620] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
[ 2658.321624] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
Kernel version:
[ 2658.321624] mdadm: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
root@zotac:~# uname -a
Linux zotac 3.0.0-24-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 24 15:38:25 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
mdadm version:
root@zotac:~# mdadm -V
mdadm - v3.1.4 - 31st August 2010
root@zotac:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid6] [raid5]
[raid4] [raid10]
md1 : active raid1 sde3[2](S) sdd2[0] sdb2[1]
487861824 blocks [2/2] [UU]
bitmap: 1/4 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk
md0 : active raid1 sde2[2](S) sdd1[0] sdb1[1]
521984 blocks [2/2] [UU]
bitmap: 0/1 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
Any pointers would be gratefully received.
Thanks, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
2012-08-19 7:42 Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade Jan Ceuleers
@ 2012-08-22 11:26 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-22 16:04 ` Jan Ceuleers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2012-08-22 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On 08/19/2012 09:42 AM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
...
> For the first time ever I tried mdadm's incremental mode. So before
> issuing the above two commands I tried the following;
>
> root@zotac:~# mdadm -I /dev/sde2
> mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
I have now straced this, and here are the offending lines:
ioctl(4, 0x40140921, 0x7fff4bda3858) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
write(2, "mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 t"..., 62mdadm: failed to add
/dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
fd 4 is /dev/md0
How does one decode the ioctl call?
Thanks, Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
2012-08-22 11:26 ` Jan Ceuleers
@ 2012-08-22 16:04 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-22 16:34 ` Jan Ceuleers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2012-08-22 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On 08/22/2012 01:26 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> On 08/19/2012 09:42 AM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> ...
>
>> For the first time ever I tried mdadm's incremental mode. So before
>> issuing the above two commands I tried the following;
>>
>> root@zotac:~# mdadm -I /dev/sde2
>> mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
>
> I have now straced this, and here are the offending lines:
>
> ioctl(4, 0x40140921, 0x7fff4bda3858) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> write(2, "mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 t"..., 62mdadm: failed to add
> /dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
>
> fd 4 is /dev/md0
>
> How does one decode the ioctl call?
Seems to be ADD_NEW_DISK(MD_MAJOR=md0, &mdu_disk_info_t)
I'm afraid I don't know how to interpret the last argument: is this a
pointer or is it the contents of the struct (which should contain five
ints, namely number, major, minor, raid_disks and state)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade
2012-08-22 16:04 ` Jan Ceuleers
@ 2012-08-22 16:34 ` Jan Ceuleers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2012-08-22 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On 08/22/2012 06:04 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 01:26 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>> On 08/19/2012 09:42 AM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>> For the first time ever I tried mdadm's incremental mode. So before
>>> issuing the above two commands I tried the following;
>>>
>>> root@zotac:~# mdadm -I /dev/sde2
>>> mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
>>
>> I have now straced this, and here are the offending lines:
>>
>> ioctl(4, 0x40140921, 0x7fff4bda3858) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
>> write(2, "mdadm: failed to add /dev/sde2 t"..., 62mdadm: failed to add
>> /dev/sde2 to /dev/md0: Invalid argument.
>>
>> fd 4 is /dev/md0
>>
>> How does one decode the ioctl call?
>
> Seems to be ADD_NEW_DISK(MD_MAJOR=md0, &mdu_disk_info_t)
>
> I'm afraid I don't know how to interpret the last argument: is this a
> pointer or is it the contents of the struct (which should contain five
> ints, namely number, major, minor, raid_disks and state)?
The (minor, major) numbers of /dev/sde2 are (8, 66) or (0x08, 0x42).
Can't find those in the third ioctl argument.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-22 16:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-19 7:42 Spares not added upon reboot after distro upgrade Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-22 11:26 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-22 16:04 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-22 16:34 ` Jan Ceuleers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).