From: joystick <joystick@shiftmail.org>
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3TB drives failure rate
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 01:12:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508DC9F5.1040504@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508DAD6F.1070509@turmel.org>
On 10/28/12 23:10, Phil Turmel wrote:
> The drives I've suffered with on this have ignored the link reset and
> were still unresponsive when MD tried to rewrite the sector(s) involved
> (from the other drives in the array).
Very interesting
I would like to see this behaviour to make some experiments.
I would like to simulate an unreadable sector...
I see --make-bad-sector in hdparm, does that simulate an unreadable
sector faithfully?
(e.g. will it even be recorded in SMART current_pending_sector /
reallocated_sector_ct ?)
Also, how do I trigger a link reset manually?
Thank you
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-29 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 12:15 3TB drives failure rate Rainer Fügenstein
2012-10-28 12:19 ` Mathias Burén
2012-10-28 12:49 ` John Robinson
2012-10-28 12:54 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-10-28 16:47 ` Ed W
2012-10-28 17:05 ` Joe Landman
2012-10-28 22:12 ` joystick
2012-10-28 22:24 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 23:59 ` joystick
2012-10-29 0:09 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-29 4:29 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-29 7:54 ` David Brown
2012-10-29 13:02 ` Phil Turmel
2012-10-30 23:54 ` 3TB drives failure rate (summary) Rainer Fügenstein
2012-10-31 12:35 ` Phil Turmel
2012-11-01 15:13 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-11-01 15:24 ` John Robinson
2012-11-01 15:39 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-11-01 16:05 ` John Robinson
2012-11-01 16:25 ` Miles Fidelman
2013-02-05 17:43 ` Adam Goryachev
2013-02-05 18:08 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-02-05 20:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-10-29 13:26 ` 3TB drives failure rate Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 19:50 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 19:59 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 20:10 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 20:16 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 20:34 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 20:49 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 20:59 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:07 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 20:50 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:07 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:18 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-10-28 21:24 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2012-10-28 21:45 ` Miles Fidelman
2012-10-28 22:35 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:51 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:59 ` joystick
2012-10-28 22:10 ` Phil Turmel
2012-10-29 0:12 ` joystick [this message]
2012-10-29 0:21 ` Phil Turmel
2012-10-29 0:27 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 21:21 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2012-10-28 23:51 ` Peter Kieser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508DC9F5.1040504@shiftmail.org \
--to=joystick@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).