From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Turmel Subject: Re: Issue with Raid 10 super block failing Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:47:46 -0500 Message-ID: <50AA9AF2.3070501@turmel.org> References: <50A82267.9030802@turmel.org> <50A8F247.8060002@turmel.org> <50A91487.70806@turmel.org> <50A92F53.5080100@turmel.org> <50AA36AD.4080100@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Drew Reusser Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 11/19/2012 03:41 PM, Drew Reusser wrote: > > Looking at this from all angles, is there a way to look at the > individual disks (like sdb and sde) and build a raid 0 from them and > see if that works? Is there a way to see which if any are bad from a > file system point of view and exclude it and try to rebuild it? I am > just grasping at straws trying to figure out which way to go. The effort to examine the drives to figure out how they would go together in a raid 0 is the same effort to figure out how they go together in the original raid 10,n2. So, no. But look again at my e-mail from earlier today for scanning the individual drives. Please also answer whether you used '--assume-clean' each time you recreated the array. Phil