From: Robert Buchholz <robert.buchholz@goodpoint.de>
To: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Find mismatch in data blocks during raid6 repair
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:58:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5100581.utCIcpy8f5@peanut> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE315CE.9090201@anonymous.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]
Hello John,
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 01:38:38 PM John Robinson wrote:
> On 20/06/2012 18:41, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> [...]
>
> > When repairing a full raid6 with no missing drives
> > (raid-devices=n+2), a single inconsistent data block could be
> > detected
>
> Yes, it could. See Neil Brown's blog post as to the many reasons why
> this isn't implemented: http://neil.brown.name/blog/20100211050355
Thank you for the pointer, I did not find the article before.
I agree with Neil's premise, this should not be run on a mounted raid as
changing data blocks can be a problem, and it should not be the default
for resync. However, as both Neil and commenters point out, this is a
valuable (offline) repair option.
Do you know whether the "smart" algorithm or the API necessary to
construct a user space program are on the agenda?
Cheers
Robert
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-20 17:41 Find mismatch in data blocks during raid6 repair Robert Buchholz
2012-06-21 12:38 ` John Robinson
2012-06-21 14:58 ` Robert Buchholz [this message]
2012-06-21 18:23 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-06-29 18:16 ` Robert Buchholz
2012-06-30 11:48 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-07-03 19:10 ` Robert Buchholz
2012-07-03 20:27 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-07-09 3:43 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-20 10:40 ` [PATCH] " Robert Buchholz
2012-07-20 14:14 ` Robert Buchholz
2012-07-20 10:53 ` Robert Buchholz
2012-07-21 16:00 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5100581.utCIcpy8f5@peanut \
--to=robert.buchholz@goodpoint.de \
--cc=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).