linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Buchholz <robert.buchholz@goodpoint.de>
To: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Find mismatch in data blocks during raid6 repair
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:58:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5100581.utCIcpy8f5@peanut> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE315CE.9090201@anonymous.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]

Hello John,

On Thursday, June 21, 2012 01:38:38 PM John Robinson wrote:
> On 20/06/2012 18:41, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > When repairing a full raid6 with no missing drives
> > (raid-devices=n+2), a single inconsistent data block could be
> > detected
> 
> Yes, it could. See Neil Brown's blog post as to the many reasons why
> this isn't implemented: http://neil.brown.name/blog/20100211050355

Thank you for the pointer, I did not find the article before.
I agree with Neil's premise, this should not be run on a mounted raid as 
changing data blocks can be a problem, and it should not be the default 
for resync. However, as both Neil and commenters point out, this is a 
valuable (offline) repair option.

Do you know whether the "smart" algorithm or the API necessary to 
construct a user space program are on the agenda?


Cheers

Robert

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 17:41 Find mismatch in data blocks during raid6 repair Robert Buchholz
2012-06-21 12:38 ` John Robinson
2012-06-21 14:58   ` Robert Buchholz [this message]
2012-06-21 18:23     ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-06-29 18:16       ` Robert Buchholz
2012-06-30 11:48         ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-07-03 19:10           ` Robert Buchholz
2012-07-03 20:27             ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2012-07-09  3:43               ` NeilBrown
2012-07-20 10:40                 ` [PATCH] " Robert Buchholz
2012-07-20 14:14                   ` Robert Buchholz
2012-07-20 10:53               ` Robert Buchholz
2012-07-21 16:00                 ` Piergiorgio Sartor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5100581.utCIcpy8f5@peanut \
    --to=robert.buchholz@goodpoint.de \
    --cc=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).