* Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success
@ 2013-03-05 1:53 Brad Campbell
2013-03-05 18:34 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brad Campbell @ 2013-03-05 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-RAID
G'day all,
I have a RAID6 of 10 2TB drives. One started to grow bad sectors at an
alarming rate, so rather than fail and replace the drive I thought I'd
use the hot replace method.
Add spare to array
echo want_replacement > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdm/state
Wait 6 hours
Remove failed drive
Job done.
Last time I tried this (lots of kernel versions ago) I had all sorts of
issues with removing the failed drive and other sticky stuff that
required rebooting to clean up. This "just worked".
Regards,
Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success
2013-03-05 1:53 Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success Brad Campbell
@ 2013-03-05 18:34 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-03-05 23:57 ` Brad Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2013-03-05 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brad Campbell; +Cc: Linux-RAID
> Add spare to array
> echo want_replacement > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdm/state
> Wait 6 hours
> Remove failed drive
> Job done.
>
> Last time I tried this (lots of kernel versions ago) I had all sorts
> of
> issues with removing the failed drive and other sticky stuff that
> required rebooting to clean up. This "just worked".
This is great. Any idea when that came in?
Btw, with as many as 10 drives in a RAID-6, I'd keep at least one spare permanently there…
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success
2013-03-05 18:34 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2013-03-05 23:57 ` Brad Campbell
2013-03-06 2:21 ` Keith Keller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brad Campbell @ 2013-03-05 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: roy@karlsbakk.net; +Cc: Linux-RAID
On 06/03/2013, at 2:34 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net> wrote:
>> Add spare to array
>> echo want_replacement > /sys/block/md0/md/dev-sdm/state
>> Wait 6 hours
>> Remove failed drive
>> Job done.
>>
>> Last time I tried this (lots of kernel versions ago) I had all sorts
>> of
>> issues with removing the failed drive and other sticky stuff that
>> required rebooting to clean up. This "just worked".
>
> This is great. Any idea when that came in?
>
> Btw, with as many as 10 drives in a RAID-6, I'd keep at least one spare permanently there…
>
Im pretty sure I last tested it about 3.2 or 3.3.
I do keep a permanent spare drive, but with 3 arrays I manually allocate it in the rare event it is required. This drive had not failed out of the array, so the spare sat idle until I proactively replaced the dodgy drive.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success
2013-03-05 23:57 ` Brad Campbell
@ 2013-03-06 2:21 ` Keith Keller
2013-03-06 3:33 ` Brad Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keith Keller @ 2013-03-06 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On 2013-03-05, Brad Campbell <brad@fnarfbargle.com> wrote:
>
> I do keep a permanent spare drive, but with 3 arrays I manually allocate it in the rare event it is required. This drive had not failed out of the array, so the spare sat idle until I proactively replaced the dodgy drive.--
Are you using the spare-group attribute of arrays in mdadm.conf? If so,
how well has it worked in your scenario?
--keith
--
kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success
2013-03-06 2:21 ` Keith Keller
@ 2013-03-06 3:33 ` Brad Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brad Campbell @ 2013-03-06 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Keller; +Cc: linux-raid
On 06/03/13 10:21, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-03-05, Brad Campbell <brad@fnarfbargle.com> wrote:
>>
>> I do keep a permanent spare drive, but with 3 arrays I manually allocate it in the rare event it is required. This drive had not failed out of the array, so the spare sat idle until I proactively replaced the dodgy drive.--
>
> Are you using the spare-group attribute of arrays in mdadm.conf?
No, have not got that advanced yet. I just keep on top of the monitoring
e-mails and manage things manually. Thanks for the reminder though. I do
need to have a look at that a bit closer when I get some more time.
Would not have helped in this application though.
Regards,
Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-06 3:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-05 1:53 Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success Brad Campbell
2013-03-05 18:34 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-03-05 23:57 ` Brad Campbell
2013-03-06 2:21 ` Keith Keller
2013-03-06 3:33 ` Brad Campbell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).