Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@redhost.ro>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Incredibly poor performance of mdraid-1 with 2 SSD Samsung 840 PRO
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:01:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5176239D.6060209@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5171CBF9.9020701@redhost.ro>

On 4/19/2013 5:58 PM, Andrei Banu wrote:
> Hardware: SuperMicro 5017C-MTRF

Not relevant if you're using SATA ports 0-1, but may well be if using
2-5, assuming this system isn't brand new.  As I said previously, you'd
see some errors in dmesg if you had port/cable issues.  From:

Intel® 6 Series Chipset and Intel® C200 Series Chipset Specification Update


Problem:  Due to a circuit design issue on Intel 6 Series Chipset and
Intel C200 Series Chipset, electrical lifetime wear out may affect clock
distribution for SATA ports 2-5. This may manifest itself as a
functional issue on SATA ports 2-5 over time.

•The electrical lifetime wear out may result in device oxide degradation
which over time can cause drain to gate leakage current.

•This issue has time, temperature and voltage sensitivities.

Implication:  The increased leakage current may result in an unstable
clock and potentially functional issues on SATA ports 2-5 in the form of
receive errors, transmit errors, and unrecognized drives.

...
•SATA ports 0-1 are not affected by this design issue as they have
separate clock generation circuitry.

Workaround:  Intel has worked with board and system manufacturers to
identify and implement solutions for affected systems.

•Use only SATA ports 0-1.
•Use an add-in PCIe SATA bridge solution.


Not all boards are affected by this.  You'd have to check the spec
revision on your C202, which means contacting SuperMicro with your board
revision/serial number.  To be certain you're not affected simply use
only ports 0-1.  But on that note...

It may be an opportune time to consider dropping in a LSI 9211-4i.
4GB/s raw throughput, plenty for 4 SSDs at full boogie should you
expand.  The kit version comes with a 1-4 breakout cable for your 1U SM
chassis drive backplane.  Even if we get your issue fixed via software
and both drives are humming away at ~260MB/s, that nightly backup
process you mentioned, and others, would surely benefit from an
additional ~200MB/s throughput.

-- 
Stan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-23  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-19 22:58 Incredibly poor performance of mdraid-1 with 2 SSD Samsung 840 PRO Andrei Banu
     [not found] ` <CAH3kUhEaZGON=fAyVMZOz5fH_DcfKv=hCa96UCeK4pN7k81c_Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-20 23:26   ` Andrei Banu
     [not found]   ` <51725458.7020109@redhost.ro>
     [not found]     ` <CAH3kUhHxBiqugFQm=PPJNNe9jOdKy0etUjQNsoDz_LJNUCLCCQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-20 23:25       ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-20 23:26       ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-21  2:48         ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-21 12:23           ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-21 16:48             ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-21 19:33             ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-21 19:56               ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-22  0:47                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-22  7:51                   ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-22  8:29                     ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-22 10:26                     ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-22 12:02                       ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-23  2:59                         ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-22 23:21                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-25 11:38         ` Thomas Jarosch
2013-04-21  0:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
     [not found] ` <51732E2B.6090607@hardwarefreak.com>
2013-04-21 20:46   ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-21 23:17     ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-22 10:19       ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-23  2:51         ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-23 10:17           ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-24  3:24             ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-24  8:26               ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-24  9:12                 ` Adam Goryachev
2013-04-24 10:24                   ` Tommy Apel
2013-04-24 21:42                     ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-24 21:40                   ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-24 16:37                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-24 21:46                   ` Andrei Banu
     [not found]                     ` <CAH3kUhHnF0imY=CAHfzaQy4XJuOMgOtbHNp17EYzeSJR2en7Fg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-25 10:11                       ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-25 10:56                     ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-22 23:11       ` Andrei Banu
2013-04-23  4:39         ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-22 23:25       ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-23  4:49         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-04-23  6:01 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5176239D.6060209@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=andrei.banu@redhost.ro \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox