From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roberto Nunnari Subject: Re: replacing drives Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:10:28 +0200 Message-ID: <517FDEE4.8040605@supsi.ch> References: <517A8EB5.8080100@supsi.ch> <20130426155347.GA9928@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <517FC46A.1080702@supsi.ch> <517FD7BE.8040401@supsi.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-raid.ids Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > >> what the... these are SECONDS! What on earth could delay a sata >> attached disk read for 30 (now 180) seconds if not a disk failure? I >> OS hang? Sorry about that question, but I don't understand.. I have >> never seen such a problem. > > A consumer drive will spend considerable time trying to read a sector > before giving up. I believe 120 seconds is not uncommon. > > The raid drives will typically give up after 7 seconds. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-Limited_Error_Recovery ok.. thank you for the explanation. Now I got it. :-) Robi