From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: RFC swap over raid1 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:35:42 -0400 Message-ID: <51FBEDEE.1000801@redhat.com> References: <51FAE985.1040809@redhat.com> <51FB63C8.2090300@hardwarefreak.com> <51FBD2DC.3010900@redhat.com> <51FBDFDF.70008@redhat.com> <51FBE34B.3000504@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Roberto Spadim Cc: Stan Hoeppner , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 08/02/2013 01:29 PM, Roberto Spadim wrote: > nice, well, considering everything... > > 1)partitions + raid1 is prefered for read speed and security > 2)fileswap only if i can't add partitions > 3)only use swap over single drive if don't have two devices (in this > case use raid1) > 4)there's no badblock layer in linux, each layer / filesystem must > implement it by yourself > > that's all right? Yep.