Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:40:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <521177A2.2010704@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kurge6$qi0$1@ger.gmane.org>

On 8/18/2013 5:05 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a good explanation of the read performance impact
> of small (RAID-5 and RAID-6) chunk sizes?

Can you elaborate on your workload that demonstrates this?  Different
workloads behave differently with different chunk sizes.

> I understand why large chunks hurt write performance...

Again this is workload dependent.  Large chunks increase write and read
performance for large streaming workloads.

> The "read penalty" is definitely there; I can see it in the test data
> from my NAS.  I just don't understand *why* it's there.

If you can see it, then please demonstrate this read penalty with
numbers.  You obviously have test data from the same set of disks with
two different RAID5s of different chunk sizes.  This is required to see
such a difference in performance.  Please share this data with us.

-- 
Stan



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-18 22:05 Small chunk size read performance penalty Ian Pilcher
2013-08-18 22:16 ` Roberto Spadim
2013-08-19  1:40 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2013-08-19  5:49   ` Ian Pilcher
2013-08-20  2:28     ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-08-19  3:01 ` Roberto Spadim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=521177A2.2010704@hardwarefreak.com \
    --to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    --cc=arequipeno@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox