From: Robert Schultz <rob@schultzfamily.ca>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:29:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523A619F.90302@schultzfamily.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52365AE8.5010807@turmel.org>
That all worked beautifully. Right up until I left the BackupPC running
against a RAID array with a bad disk.
It failed again after about 30 hours. The symptoms are the same.
I think I need to bring the array back up but leave that disk offline with:
mdadm --assemble --force /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
(sdd is the bad drive)
Then follow the remainder of the steps to check.
I have a new disk on the way. I would then add this new disk into the
array and sync.
Does that sound correct?
Rob
On 13-09-15 09:12 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 09/15/2013 04:42 PM, Robert Schultz wrote:
>> Phil:
>>
>> Thank you for the information. This is my backup machine. Up to this
>> point I wasn't concerned about having a second copy of this machine, but
>> I have a tendency to decommission a computer and leave the backups on by
>> backuppc for archive purposes. I probably don't really, really need
>> anything on this PC. That said I'm am very paranoid that I will have
>> some other failure before I can resolve this :-(
>>
>> I hadn't read anything about timing in disks in RAID - I'll have to go
>> do some research. I see WD has their RED series that appears to be
>> directed to this market.
> Please do read the archives on the topic. You won't regret it.
>
> And yes, the WD REDs power up with SCTERC set properly. I bought four
> of these for my new media server.
>
>> Here is the information requested. Please let me know if this changes
>> anything in your instructions. I'll hold off until you confirm.
> One modest change. Two of your drives *do* support SCTERC, they just
> have to have it enabled on every powerup:
>
>> SCT Error Recovery Control:
>> Read: Disabled
>> Write: Disabled
> For those two drives, your boot sequence should have:
>
> smartctl -l scterc,70,70 /dev/sdX
>
> For the other, you still need:
>
> echo 180 >/sys/block/sdX/device/timeout
>
> Otherwise, my recommendations stand.
>
> Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-19 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 14:55 RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved? Robert Schultz
2013-09-14 14:24 ` Phil Turmel
2013-09-15 20:42 ` Robert Schultz
2013-09-16 1:12 ` Phil Turmel
2013-09-19 2:29 ` Robert Schultz [this message]
2013-09-19 5:35 ` Phil Turmel
2013-09-19 17:38 ` Robert Schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523A619F.90302@schultzfamily.ca \
--to=rob@schultzfamily.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip@turmel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).