From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Levente Kurusa Subject: Re: [PATCH] mdadm.8.in Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 18:59:39 +0100 Message-ID: <526FF78B.10708@linux.com> References: Reply-To: levex@linux.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: John Schmidt , linux-raid , linux-kernel List-Id: linux-raid.ids 2013-10-29 18:16 keltez=E9ssel, John Schmidt =EDrta: > I found a small bug in the documentation of mdadm. I fixed it in my > local git clone of git://neil.brown.name/mdadm Here is the change: >=20 > git diff mdadm.8.in > diff --git a/mdadm.8.in b/mdadm.8.in > index 09aff81..006ae59 100644 > --- a/mdadm.8.in > +++ b/mdadm.8.in > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ amount of available space is. > .BR \-c ", " \-\-chunk=3D > Specify chunk size of kibibytes. The default when creating an > array is 512KB. To ensure compatibility with earlier versions, the > -default when Building and array with no persistent metadata is 64KB. > +default when building an array with no persistent metadata is 64KB. > This is only meaningful for RAID0, RAID4, RAID5, RAID6, and RAID10. >=20 > RAID4, RAID5, RAID6, and RAID10 require the chunk size to be a power >=20 > Let me know if there are other things I need to do to get this patch = submitted. Hi, I don't think this belongs to LKML. I am not familiar with linux-raid but I think that the following guidel= ines do apply there as well. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches Other than this, the patch is a legitimate one, I am sure it will be ac= cepted. -- Regards, Levente Kurusa