* raid5 raid5d multi-thread
@ 2013-11-01 3:27 lilofile
2013-11-01 16:19 ` Stan Hoeppner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: lilofile @ 2013-11-01 3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
now in MD raid5,stripe is hande in one thread, and I found the CPU occupation is very high, why stripe is not handled in multi-thread ? is any different to implement? and what consideration in original design?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: raid5 raid5d multi-thread
2013-11-01 3:27 raid5 raid5d multi-thread lilofile
@ 2013-11-01 16:19 ` Stan Hoeppner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stan Hoeppner @ 2013-11-01 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lilofile, linux-raid
On 10/31/2013 10:27 PM, lilofile wrote:
> now in MD raid5,stripe is hande in one thread, and I found the CPU occupation is very high, why stripe is not handled in multi-thread ? is any different to implement? and what consideration in original design?
Shaohua Li has been working on a threaded RAID5 implementation for many
months now. AFAIK it is not yet ready for inclusion nor widespread
testing by others. See:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/30/29
--
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-01 16:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-01 3:27 raid5 raid5d multi-thread lilofile
2013-11-01 16:19 ` Stan Hoeppner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).