From: joystick <joystick@shiftmail.org>
To: Pieter De Wit <pieter@insync.za.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A9F7AC.30209@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A98FAF.4000205@insync.za.net>
On 12/12/2013 11:27, Pieter De Wit wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Given the recent work done with techs like CUDA etc. - has the idea
> been floated to use the video card for RAID parity calculations vs the
> CPU ?
Sending the XOR computation to the GPU is like shooting a fly with a cannon.
The bandwidth to the GPU would be the bottleneck by 2 orders of
magnitude if you try to do this.
XOR is a way too simple operation. Even if it was a stream of double *
double multiplications, the bottleneck would lie in the bandwidth
to/from the GPU.
You can gain something only if you do a matrix multiplication where each
float or double is uploaded only once but reused many times in all the
row x column multiplications.
The best performers on the GPU are the autoctonous applications, which
operate autonomously and communicate very little with the CPU for a very
long time.
The XOR computation is WAY fast enough on modern processors. There is a
benchmark at boot about this:
dmesg | grep "raid6: using algorithm"
returns:
[ 5.072162] raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 (7556 MB/s)
7.5 GB/sec, and that's raid6, not even XOR.
Probably even single-threaded.
(probably this does not include the memory-copy overhead)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 10:27 Using Video cards (CUDA) for RAID parity Pieter De Wit
2013-12-12 11:44 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
2013-12-16 16:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-12-12 11:52 ` David Brown
2013-12-12 16:57 ` Pieter De Wit
2013-12-12 17:13 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
[not found] ` <ff87dc745635b18a71b98ce36356eea7@insync.za.net>
2013-12-12 18:57 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
2013-12-12 17:30 ` Chris Green
2013-12-12 17:51 ` joystick [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A9F7AC.30209@shiftmail.org \
--to=joystick@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pieter@insync.za.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).