From: Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>
To: stan@hardwarefreak.com, Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>,
joystick <joystick@shiftmail.org>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The chunk size paradox
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:21:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C5BC28.2020003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C5A9AA.9090300@hardwarefreak.com>
On 01/02/2014 01:02 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 1/2/2014 10:31 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> On 1/2/2014 10:41 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> First, there is no such thing as a 4K sector in Linux. Sectors are
>>> 512 bytes. Filesystem blocks and memory pages are 4K.
>>
>> Of course there is. Disks with 4k sectors are becoming more and more
>> popular.
>
> Please read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format
>
> There are no native 4K sector drives on the market. Linux does not
Untrue.
http://storage.toshiba.eu/cms/en/hdd/hard_disk_drives/product_detail.jsp?productid=452
http://www.seagate.com/www-content/product-content/constellation-fam/constellation-cs/en-us/docs/terascale-hdd-data-sheet-ds1793-1-1306us.pdf
and many others.
512 byte sector native drives are now far less common, with many of the
drives being native 4096 bytes with a translation layer for legacy
systems that require 512 bytes. This is infamous for wreaking havoc
with alignment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-02 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-30 18:48 The chunk size paradox Phillip Susi
2013-12-30 23:38 ` Peter Grandi
2013-12-31 0:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-12-31 13:51 ` David Brown
2014-01-02 20:08 ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 14:49 ` joystick
2014-01-02 15:24 ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 15:41 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 16:31 ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 18:02 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 19:10 ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 22:49 ` Peter Grandi
2014-01-02 23:16 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-03 1:02 ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 19:21 ` Joe Landman [this message]
2014-01-02 22:42 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 22:56 ` Carsten Aulbert
2014-01-03 0:19 ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-03 1:24 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-03 3:14 ` Joe Landman
2014-01-03 3:19 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-03 4:24 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 23:22 ` Peter Grandi
2014-01-03 3:09 ` Joe Landman
2014-01-03 4:58 ` Joe Landman
2014-01-02 22:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-01-03 14:51 ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52C5BC28.2020003@gmail.com \
--to=joe.landman@gmail.com \
--cc=joystick@shiftmail.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@ubuntu.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).