linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
To: stan@hardwarefreak.com
Cc: Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>,
	joystick <joystick@shiftmail.org>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The chunk size paradox
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:56:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C5EE8F.3090204@aei.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C5EB62.1090807@hardwarefreak.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]

Hi

sorry late in joining the thread

On 01/02/2014 11:42 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> 
> Damn, you had me salivating Joe.  These are both AF 512e drives, not
> native 4K.
> 
>> and many others.
> 
> I've not yet seen an announcement from anyone.  I'm not all seeing, but
> I'd think such an announcement would cross my RADAR.
> 

Just look around:


http://www.wdc.com/wdproducts/library/SpecSheet/ENG/2879-771475.pdf

and then the FAQ about "Advanced Format":

https://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5655

Why would one need to align to 4k if the on disk layout would be 512bytes?

Or did I miss something?

Cheers

Carsten


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 2044 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-02 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-30 18:48 The chunk size paradox Phillip Susi
2013-12-30 23:38 ` Peter Grandi
2013-12-31  0:01   ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-12-31 13:51     ` David Brown
2014-01-02 20:08   ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 14:49 ` joystick
2014-01-02 15:24   ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 15:41   ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 16:31     ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 18:02       ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 19:10         ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 22:49           ` Peter Grandi
2014-01-02 23:16           ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-03  1:02             ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-02 19:21         ` Joe Landman
2014-01-02 22:42           ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 22:56             ` Carsten Aulbert [this message]
2014-01-03  0:19               ` Phillip Susi
2014-01-03  1:24               ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-03  3:14               ` Joe Landman
2014-01-03  3:19                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-03  4:24                   ` Stan Hoeppner
2014-01-02 23:22           ` Peter Grandi
2014-01-03  3:09             ` Joe Landman
2014-01-03  4:58             ` Joe Landman
2014-01-02 22:32         ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-01-03 14:51           ` Benjamin ESTRABAUD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52C5EE8F.3090204@aei.mpg.de \
    --to=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
    --cc=joe.landman@gmail.com \
    --cc=joystick@shiftmail.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=psusi@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).