From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: livelock during MD device open
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:11:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D688FE.2030908@freebox.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140115125740.160e8998@notabene.brown>
On 01/15/2014 02:57 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
[...]
> That's a very small race you are consistently losing - if I understand
> correctly.
>
> In __blkdev_get:
>
> restart:
>
> ret = -ENXIO;
> disk = get_gendisk(bdev->bd_dev, &partno);
> if (!disk)
> goto out;
> owner = disk->fops->owner;
>
> disk_block_events(disk);
> mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, for_part);
>
>
> The "get_gendisk" calls into md_alloc (via md_probe) and then add_disk(),
> which generates a uevent which is handled by udev.
> And before the above code gets to the mutex_lock_nexted(), the process run by
> udev must have opened the device (executing all that code above and more) and
> issued the ioctl.
>
> I guess it is possible, but happening every time to produce a live-lock
> suggests that the scheduler must be encouraging that behaviour. Presumably
> this is a virtual machine with just one CPU ??
add_disk() will call schedule via call_usermode_helper() (for /sbin/hotplug),
the scheduler will, I think, almost always choose to schedule the "udev"
process instead of the process which did the first open to the md device, once
the usermode helper has run.
SysRq + 'w' consistently showed a process that had called schedule() from
md_alloc() -> add_disk() ... -> call_usermodehelper():
[ 57.932671] test D 805ac41c 0 748 745 0x00000000
[ 57.939075] [<805ac41c>] (__schedule+0x33c/0x3b0) from [<805aa8f0>]
(schedule_timeout+0x18/0x168)
[ 57.947984] [<805aa8f0>] (schedule_timeout+0x18/0x168) from [<805abfa4>]
(wait_for_common+0xf0/0x198)
[ 57.957245] [<805abfa4>] (wait_for_common+0xf0/0x198) from [<80029e30>]
(call_usermodehelper_exec+0xf8/0x15c)
[ 57.967205] [<80029e30>] (call_usermodehelper_exec+0xf8/0x15c) from
[<8028abd0>] (kobject_uevent_env+0x37c/0x3e8)
[ 57.977515] [<8028abd0>] (kobject_uevent_env+0x37c/0x3e8) from [<8027cff8>]
(add_disk+0x29c/0x400)
[ 57.986520] [<8027cff8>] (add_disk+0x29c/0x400) from [<803bbcac>]
(md_alloc+0x1cc/0x2cc)
[ 57.994645] [<803bbcac>] (md_alloc+0x1cc/0x2cc) from [<803bbe38>]
(md_probe+0xc/0x14)
[ 58.002511] [<803bbe38>] (md_probe+0xc/0x14) from [<802ede10>]
(kobj_lookup+0xd8/0x110)
[ 58.010550] [<802ede10>] (kobj_lookup+0xd8/0x110) from [<8027cacc>]
(get_gendisk+0x2c/0xe0)
[ 58.018942] [<8027cacc>] (get_gendisk+0x2c/0xe0) from [<800c0598>]
(__blkdev_get+0x28/0x364)
[ 58.027416] [<800c0598>] (__blkdev_get+0x28/0x364) from [<800c0ab0>]
(blkdev_get+0x1dc/0x318)
[ 58.035983] [<800c0ab0>] (blkdev_get+0x1dc/0x318) from [<800918bc>]
(do_dentry_open.isra.15+0x184/0x248)
[ 58.045510] [<800918bc>] (do_dentry_open.isra.15+0x184/0x248) from
[<800919a4>] (finish_open+0x24/0x38)
[ 58.054945] [<800919a4>] (finish_open+0x24/0x38) from [<8009fb40>]
(do_last+0x9a8/0xc08)
[ 58.063071] [<8009fb40>] (do_last+0x9a8/0xc08) from [<8009ffdc>]
(path_openat+0x23c/0x5c8)
[ 58.071371] [<8009ffdc>] (path_openat+0x23c/0x5c8) from [<800a0620>]
(do_filp_open+0x2c/0x78)
[ 58.079935] [<800a0620>] (do_filp_open+0x2c/0x78) from [<800929b4>]
(do_sys_open+0x124/0x1c4)
[ 58.088498] [<800929b4>] (do_sys_open+0x124/0x1c4) from [<80009060>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)
The system showing the livelock is a Marvell 88F6282 CPU (single core processor).
It took me some time start to suspect the problem was due to the md_ioctl()
code :)
> I suppose the best fix is, as you suggest, to avoid clearing hold_active for
> invalid ioctls. It feels a bit like papering over a bug, but I think the
> only way to really fix it is to add extra locking to the above code sequence
> and I don't want to do that.
>
> Of your two suggestions I much prefer the second. It will be more code, but
> it is also more obviously correct. The current code is rather messy with
> respect to invalid ioctl commands.
>
> I would be happy to accept a patch which aborted md_ioctl if the cmd wasn't
> one of those known to md.
I'll send a patch for that then.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Schichan
Freebox SAS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 17:14 livelock during MD device open Nicolas Schichan
2014-01-15 1:57 ` NeilBrown
2014-01-15 13:11 ` Nicolas Schichan [this message]
2014-01-15 15:58 ` [PATCH] md: check command validity early in md_ioctl() Nicolas Schichan
2014-01-15 21:55 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D688FE.2030908@freebox.fr \
--to=nschichan@freebox.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).